EDITORIAL: Mayor Coffman’s bewildering lawsuit against the city’s election law is a vote for trouble

700

Mayor Mike Coffman moved recently to the top of the list of What Was He Thinking when he filed a lawsuit last week against the city to get around a local campaign transparency law he doesn’t like.

To understand what a difficult place Coffman has put himself and the city in, you have to understand what he actually did.

For years, Aurora, and similar large cities, have struggled to scrutinize campaign finance and election laws. State and federal governments have fought their way through endless battles that have more times than not left the public interest behind.

At stake is the need for the public to know whose money is influencing votes and candidates, and how much.

The benefit of transparency in election and campaign laws is clear. When voters understand that specific unions or industries are bankrolling campaign TV commercials to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, those sometimes hard-to-find facts shed critical context on an election. Nowhere like in American politics does “follow the money” take on the gravity it does.

On the other side of that are politicians, and the interests that fund them, who often don’t want the public to know who or how much is being spent to coax their votes. A good example are deep-pocket gun industries willing to pony up mountains of cash to defeat pro-gun-control candidates after a school shooting. The TV commercials combatting a candidate and paid for with gun-industry dollars often have nothing to do with gun control, a fact that usually makes voters consider the paid message.

The most consequential court ruling on the issue of corporate and union money in elections came in the landmark 2010 Supreme Court Citizen’s United decision. Although Supreme Court justices have generally defended campaign finance disclosure laws, a narrow majority of justices agreed in 2010 that restricting money spent by corporations and special interests was a First Amendment violation. Common sense and good judgment was lost in ruling that corporations are also people. The decision opened the floodgates to special interests paying big money to pull the strings on issues that pay them back handsomely on their political investments.

The big payoffs aren’t just on state and federal levels, however. Teacher unions, police unions, petroleum companies, homebuilders and many others know that there are millions and even hundreds of millions of dollars at stake when voters choose county commissioners, school board directors and city council members.

Aurora is no exception. For years, city lawmakers either looked the other way when the topic of campaign finance reform was broached, or they outright snuffed attempts to address it.

That changed this year when efforts driven primarily by councilmembers Nicole Johnston and Juan Marcano began a process to fix glaring problems. Proponents worked with Common Cause, a left-leaning non-partisan state and national organization that focuses on campaign fairness and transparency, affecting all candidates, parties and issues.

After months of work, the group created a package of changes, rules and regulations focused on limiting outside interests backing candidates and ballot issues, but mostly ensuring the public can easily discern who’s paying for advertising.

Coffman pushed against the changes. In a rare move, he offered his own proposal, outside the realm of what the position of Aurora mayor calls for. He lost votes to move his own measure forward and subsequent votes to gut parts of the proposal by Johnston and Marcano.

Last week, Coffman sued the city in an attempt to overturn the vote he lost in seeking to empower voters over candidates and big-money interests trying to buy influence.

To do this, Coffman joined efforts with The Public Trust Institute, who represents the mayor in the lawsuit.

“The organization is described by the firm’s legal director Dan Burrows as a “right-of-center public interest law firm” which takes cases pro-bono that “advance open and accountable government,” according to a story last week in The Sentinel.

This is the same group, closely aligned with the right-wing Independence Institute. Public Trust ginned up a phony ethics “scandal” last year against former Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper in an effort to throw his senatorial election to Republican Cory Gardner. The group is also behind lawsuits on behalf of big oil interests against Boulder and anti-tax proponents fighting Estes Park.

While the lawsuit is a mishmash of allegations, it focuses heavily on a part of the new Aurora law that seeks to keep local elected officials from using their influence to raise or move money to candidates for city council that they want to see get elected. The same goes for ballot questions.

“The most egregious part of the new law, that I’m challenging, strips me of my right to organize and lead campaigns for or against local ballot questions even when I’m not up for re-election and even when the local ballot question is not on a general election ballot when there are no municipal candidates on the ballot,” Coffman said in a statement he posted to Twitter. “Not only in this blatantly unconstitutional, but it has virtually nothing to do with campaign finance reform.”

He’s right and wrong. It absolutely keeps Coffman, and everyone on city council, from using their influence to raise money for or against measures or candidates only the voters should decide. The law in no way precludes Coffman from endorsing or backing ballot issues or candidates. Often elected officials become chief stumpers for issues like rec centers or open space bond issues.

Already, just about everyone on city council has already begun endorsing candidates for this fall’s municipal election, including Johnston and Marcano.

The new law, which is pretty much taken from state law, precludes elected officials in Aurora from leaning on their own political financiers to fund efforts to pass or kill ballot questions — or candidates for city council.

It’s not unconstitutional, as Coffman claims. It’s election law that’s good for the public.

You don’t have to be a studious political pundit to see that Aurora voters have moved further left each year, supporting not just progressive candidates, but causes as well. Coffman, a former Republican Congressman and career politician, narrowly won his mayoral contest two years ago against an unknown, liberal political newcomer.

How he expects to sell his allegiance to a nefarious, far-right political action group in an effort to force the city to spend taxpayer dollars defending Aurora against a suit he created that seeks to undermine transparency in election and campaign laws boggles the mind.

While much of this has moved past many Aurora residents, weary from election melodrama, the pandemic and, now, another ghastly mass shooting, it will certainly take front and center for voters should Coffman’s ploy be to hold up the election reforms in court long enough to sneak illegal campaign funding schemes into this year’s cycle.

This would be a good time for Coffman’s advisors to persuade him to drop the lawsuit and search for allies on the city council to pass any needed and acceptable amendments to the nascent law.

If dealings with The Public Trust Institute and similar groups have revealed anything in the past few years, it’s that exploding cigar schemes like this leave permanent scars.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joe Felice
Joe Felice
3 months ago

The Public Trust Institute should be named the Public Mistrust Institute, and the Independence Institute is not independent. I find it amusing that republicans give their groups names that make them sound benign or in some way in the public’s best interests. There are oil lobbies that do the same thing.

This suit is very ill-advised. If an employee sues an employer, the employee is usually terminated. Maybe we should terminate Coffman via a recall. There is no reason why elected officials should be allowed to use their position to influence voters. This does not preclude endorsing a candidate or issue, but rather, actively campaigning.

It should be noted that Coffman, for 35 years, has relied on big money, some of it from outside the State to get elected. No wonder he would oppose the new law. However, know that the voters in this town appreciate what Council has done. If only we could do that on the state and national levels. Our elections are a sordid mess and efforts to clean them up is welcomed.

We all knew that Coffman’s right-wing ideology would eventually lead to a problem in city government, and now the monster has reared its head. We have too-much discord and partisan bickering today in city government. This needs to stop if things are to be accomplished that are in the public interest. I call on all the council members and the Mayor to STOP this and to think about what the people want, not what they want.

Joe Hardhat is a Fascist
Joe Hardhat is a Fascist
3 months ago
Reply to  Joe Felice

The GOP runs on lies, including the names of their organizations. If they named themselves after their actual goals, the Evil Institute for Stealing Your Money, Benefiting the Wealthy, Screwing Over the Common Man, and Killing the Planet, they’d have a slightly harder time getting support. But only slightly, their followers are blind to their actions.

Marvin Guardens
Marvin Guardens
3 months ago

the rotten RINO GOP are your closest swamp allies

your D.C. swamp runs on Big Corporate money, and here you feign honor – LMAO

the Chi-Coms own your bogus PO<s>TU</s>S, you are a diaperfaced lockstepper, and soon you’ll get you wish for totalitarian tyranny

<b><b>then again, there are more Americans with guns than there are democrats – so BRING IT ON, FASCIST

DICK MOORE
3 months ago

I’m a long time Aurora citizen. I have followed the Campaign Law changes since the Socialists on City Council presented their program. I believe the Mayor’s lawsuit is a good thing under the circumstances. I am embarrassed that the majority of our City’s leadership is socialistic. Remember that socialistic principles go away when they don’t have any more of other people’s money to spend. That’s citizens of Aurora’s money.

It’s my opinion that the Campaign Law changes were more about socialists restricting conservatives voting power and less about campaign financing. I praise the Mayor for the job that he is doing, in an attempt to slow down the socialist’s power plays. This is what I want as a citizen of Aurora.

Joe Hardhat is a Fascist
Joe Hardhat is a Fascist
3 months ago
Reply to  DICK MOORE

Yeah…preventing shady corporations and organizations from secretly funneling money into Republican campaigns to steal elections and influence laws in their favor is a dishonest socialist ploy… You people are so blind it’s baffling.

ImmovableLadder
ImmovableLadder
3 months ago

It’s simple: Coffman can contribute to candidates from his own dime, he can endorse, he can knock doors, he can do all the things regular Aurorans can also do to support his preferred candidates.

What he can’t do is contact his rich friends to crowd out regular Aurorans with anonymous dark money campaigns. That’s what he’s mad about.