Police investigate at a Planned Parenthood clinic and area around the building north of a strip mall early Saturday, Nov. 28, 2015, in northwest Colorado Springs, Colo. A gunman who opened fire inside a Planned Parenthood clinic was arrested Friday after engaging in gun battles with authorities during an hourslong standoff that killed three people and wounded nine others, officials said. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

AURORA | Advocacy groups are calling out hateful rhetoric used by some state lawmakers following the deadly shootings Friday at a Planned Parenthood in Colorado Springs.

“We’re here to stand up today against those who use hateful and false statements to further their agenda,” said Amy Runyon-Harms, executive director of the left-leaning organization ProgressNow Colorado, who organized a press conference at the Denver Capitol building Tuesday along with the advocacy group NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado.

The organizers rallied on the steps of the Capitol and held signs showing specific phrases Colorado lawmakers have used against Planned Parenthood in recent years. The signs referenced the words of state Sen. Tim Neville, Aurora U.S. Rep. Mike Coffman and Colorado Springs state Rep. Gordon Klingenschmitt, all of whom are Republicans.

The organizers are part of a growing chorus of Planned Parenthood supporters who say Friday’s deadly shooting shows that the vitriolic rhetoric in local and national politics could be inspiring actual violence.

One of the signs held by a woman at Tuesday’s press conference in Denver attributed a phrase to Neville that said, “Some of the most disgusting videos of Planned Parenthood murdering, cutting to pieces and selling unborn baby parts were filmed right here in Denver, Colorado.”

Karen Middleton, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado, said the hateful rhetoric coming from Neville and other lawmakers is depriving women of their basic rights to safely access healthcare. She added that the attack on Planned Parenthood should be considered domestic terrorism.

“If you’re tweeting that Planned Parenthood sells baby parts, you’re part of the problem. People take these tweets, these comments quite literally and we see the results,” she said.

Runyon-Harms also called out Aurora’s Rep. Coffman for voting numerous times to defund Planned Parenthood while also using the organization’s logo in a 2014 campaign ad.

The man arrested in the attack that killed a police officer and two civilians in Colorado Springs Friday uttered the phrase “no more baby parts,” a law enforcement official said.

Authorities have not elaborated on the gunman’s possible motives, but Planned Parenthood said witnesses described him as an abortion opponent. The “body parts” phrase echoed rhetoric that surfaced last summer, when anti-abortion activists began releasing undercover videos they said showed Planned Parenthood personnel negotiating the sale of fetal organs.

The anti-abortion group that made the videos, the Center for Medical Progress, condemned the “barbaric killing spree in Colorado Springs by a violent madman.”

Planned Parenthood said any payments were legally permitted reimbursements for the costs of donating organs to researchers, and has since stopped accepting even that money. Though the videos have inspired multiple investigations in Congress and in several states, none has confirmed any law breaking by Planned Parenthood.

Since the videos surfaced, threats have become even more frequent, abortion-rights leaders say.

“We’ve seen an alarming increase in hateful rhetoric and smear campaigns against abortion providers and patients over the last few months,” said Vicki Cowart, president of Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains. “That environment breeds acts of violence.”

Last year, protesters were a common site at the Planned Parenthood clinic on South Abilene Street in Aurora. The clinic doesn’t provide abortions, but it does offer other women’s health services, including birth control.

Cowart said Planned Parenthood clinics in Aurora and across the state would not close or change their hours in light of Friday’s violent acts. But she said Planned Parenthood is taking precautions.

“Safety of our staff and patients is our top priority,” she said in a statement. “Our security plans at each site are assessed and changed constantly in response to our environment and in coordination with local staff and local law enforcement. Today and everyday. For obvious reasons, we cannot share details of our security decisions.”

In a statement to supporters Tuesday, Cowart said in the past year, Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains served more than 103,000 people — providing affordable birth control, life-saving cancer screenings, safe and legal abortion services, and other vital care.

President Barack Obama says he hopes the shootings will spur conversation and action on deterring gun violence.

Speaking at a global warming conference Tuesday, he said it will ultimately be up to Congress, states and local governments to act in ways that prevent people intent on committing violence from getting weapons.

All of the Republican presidential candidates say they favor restricting abortion rights.

Some were asked about the Colorado Springs shootings on Sunday’s talk shows.

Mike Huckabee condemned the attack as a “despicable act of murder” and said “what he did is domestic terrorism,” but then equated the killings to the abortions Planned Parenthood provides.

— The Associated Press contributed to this story.

12 replies on “Springs shooting refocuses attention on security concerns of Aurora, nearby Planned Parenthood clinics”

  1. “the vitriolic rhetoric”
    So it is the rhetoric that is inciting violence? It has nothing to do with the fact that on a daily basis hundreds of planned parenthood clinic dismember living human beings and then sell their body parts.

          1. Yes. I realize that’s a hard concept for Teatards to understand, but the law — and what’s legal — does matter in a democratic society.

  2. Before I believe the media set this dude off, I need to find where he was even aware of politics, read newspapers, or other media. All media has reported so far is he was a loner, lived in the woods in NC, Colorado and did not associate willingly with others. Would believe divorce years ago, and arrests that seemed to be dropped, probably shaped him more, and talking to himself, in his own brain did more to focus him. But I could be wrong. Without electric and running water or wells, I don’t see him as watching much television or even radio? Any thoughts out there? Not to argue, but just to exchange ideas.

    1. Frank, my thought is that people of all ages are more isolated socially than ever before. This 57-year old Dear fellow was probably never of sound mind or temper. There are millions like him to a certain degree, but they usually stay to themselves and don’t harm others.

  3. Its strange when a liberal institution is under a threat.. earth needs to change its rotation around sun because of this concern.. But when conservatives are concerned about terrorism threats from terrorists.. they are called racists.. crazies.. you fill it in.. ________. Good one.. Mr. President says.. “I am not afraid”.. Such hypocrits..

  4. Liberals would have you believe that PP is a house of respect for women, helping them with their pregnancies, and caring for them, with conversations, aid, and gentle guidance throughout their pregnancy, that’s hardly their mission. They began in poor neighborhoods, to end pregnancies in poverty stricken young minority women, and their mission continues today .https://www.blackgenocide.org/planned.html

  5. Also where do most of us see the hateful rhetoric? With folks not getting out as much as they did in youth, it is not on the streets, can’t be in the bars, since MADD closed so many of those. Or did they? I don’t know, since I never inhabited those. Did seem to be more of them in my youthful days. But somehow I have seen occupiers, school children leaving their safe classrooms to march in streets, putting our police in danger to protect them, and so many other marches where they have to be protected, yet police and military are in more danger on our streets now, than if they were in war zone in middle east. What is wrong with that picture?
    ——–
    And why are we importing the problems of other countries, that our ancestors came here to get away from? Famine, Wars, Religious church of England, and so many came from Germany (my ancestors) for freedom. OUR POLITICIANS KEEP WRITING NEW LAWS, PAINTING US INTO TIGHTER AND TIGHTER CORNERS, WHEN LAWS WRITTEN BEFORE ARE NOT ENFORCED. WHY? Parents used to know what their children were up to, but now many children do not know who their parent, or parents are? Think about that? Just my opinion, do with it anyone wants. Not written to be argumentative. Just thought and opinion.

Comments are closed.