As I write this column, I’m waiting impatiently for the first debate between Mitt Romney and President Obama.


More than 50 million Americans were expected to watch the debate in Denver on Wednesday night, and you have probably seen it by the time you read this.

I don’t know how it turned out, though The New York Times headline on Thursday probably read something like “St. Barack Slays Rich, Out-of-Touch Mormon Profiteer.”

But it’s not too important that the mainstream liberal media have tried to pre-ordain their guy as the winner. And what Romney specifically said or didn’t say on any given subject won’t matter that much either.

It was much more important that Mitt looked and acted presidential and showed us that he can be the leader we need to replace the incompetent we have in the Oval Office.

I expected Romney to do that in Denver, and pray that he did. I hope also that he came out swinging and never let up. I hope he went on the offensive. Because it’s not his economic policies that are destroying America. It’s Barack Obama’s.

In 1980 Ronald Reagan had a similar challenge when he set out to unseat an incompetent incumbent. My father proved during his first debate with Jimmy Carter that he was capable of leading the country out of the foreign and domestic wasteland Carter had created.

And then, at the end of the second debate, just a week before Election Day, my father may have won his ticket to the White House when he urged Americans to ask themselves a simple question before they voted:

“Are you better off than you were four years ago?”

My father went on to ask a series of questions:

“Is it easier for you to go and buy things in the stores than it was four years ago? Is there more or less unemployment in the country than there was four years ago? Is America as respected throughout the world as it was? Do you feel that our security is as safe, that we’re as strong as we were four years ago?”

Mitt Romney could ask the American people the same questions today.

“Are you safer than you were four years ago? Do you feel safer about your job? Safer about your mortgage? Safer about the economy? Safer about your retirement or health care?

“And based on what we’ve just witnessed in the Middle East, where one of our ambassadors was killed by terrorists and Obama’s foreign policies continue to fail, do you feel safer today against international terrorism?”

The honest answer to all of the above would be “No.”

America, it’s time to wake up. It’s time to get a new leader. Four more years of Barack Obama’s failures will not make us or our country better off or safer, no matter what first lady Michelle Obama thinks.

The other day in Ohio she was telling a crowd of Democrats that they have to fight to keep the country going in the direction it’s going.

“Are you with me?” she asked her husband’s mindless idolaters.

Was she kidding? Why in the world would you fight to keep the country going in the direction we are going when the direction we are going is downhill?

We can’t afford to wait another four years and hope that things get better. As I said last week, it’s time to get mad.

It’s time to move forward and upward — not backward. America needs to come together Nov. 6 and make the right choice — for our own good and the good of the world.

Copyright ©2012 Michael Reagan. Michael Reagan is the son of President Ronald Reagan, a political consultant, and the author of “The New Reagan Revolution” (St. Martin’s Press). He is the founder and chairman of The Reagan Group and president of The Reagan Legacy Foundation. Visit his websites at www.reagan.com and www.michaelereagan.com. Send comments to Reagan@caglecartoons.com. Follow @reaganworld on Twitter. Mike’s column is distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. For info on using columns contact Cari Dawson Bartley at cari@cagle.com or call 800-696-7561.

One reply on “REAGAN: The First Debate”

  1. Ok, Mitt did come out swinging but with distortions and outright lies. I did feel that Obama was not on his game but…. Mitt came across in a way that was aggressive left me with the feeling that he might not be able to durb that temper when dealing with a tough issue. There really was only agressiveness with no tempering on the part of Mitt. To folks like you that he probably “Presidential” to the rest of us it was like a prize fighter and unbecoming.
    Here’s the thing: Most of us who are in the middle income bracket did not fare well under your guy Bush and in my opinon will not fare well under the guy you support this year. When the fact checkers finished with the points your guy made it proved my point here. Mitt lies and distorts the truth.
    Obama may have been off his game but honestly I would rather move forward with Obama’s policies that be a republican supporting a guy who doesn’t know the truth and deludes himself and folks like you into believing that he will be good for this country.

Comments are closed.