I’m surprised that it was the death of reason that strikes me one year after the Aurora theater massacre.
As to the obscene body count, my graying hair and newsroom tenure are foils to being overwhelmed by cruel murder. I’m not callous. When James Holmes started firing into Theater 9 at the Century 16 cinema last year just after midnight, he shot through everyone’s heart in Aurora, including mine. The kids he maimed and massacred waited on us at local restaurants. They played on local football teams. They were full of the life we all take for granted.
No, I’m not at all callous. A year after the funerals, the memorials, the checking of lists of names and reporting of court proceedings, I still look off when I talk about July 20, and I never talk about it for very long. I’m angry for the dead and injured. But I’m connected to the victims’ families by raw nerves that have bound this town of 330,000 people together for the rest of our lives.
In the hours after we counted the dead and uncovered the sordid mess behind Holmes, it became clear this was not some cataclysmic anomaly that materialized here. Twelve people died, dozens more were shot, and it all could have been relatively easily prevented.
Had Holmes’ screaming mental illness been addressed, had he not been able to so easily put together an arsenal that would be the envy of any Al Qaeda terrorist cell, had authorities been alerted to his quickly assembled collection, I would be struggling to figure out what I would be writing about this week in this space.
In less time than it took grass to grow over the fresh graves of those murdered here in Aurora, it happened again in Newtown, Conn. This time, it was little girls and boys trapped in classroom while a different madman with an astonishingly efficient assault rifle plucked off his victims. President Barack Obama and endless others patted our hands last July, saying that the timing just wasn’t right to talk about gun control. The timing suddenly became perfect during the Christmas holiday while an entire town worked to bury a classroom full of murdered children.
And the reaction? Insanity. It’s as if Holmes, Loughner and Lanza assassinated the last morsel of American empathy and reason. People who couldn’t even tell you what the Second Amendment says were suddenly maniacal to ensure not one law would be passed to address the plague of civilian and military-grade weapons that has infected this country. It’s as if the first 237 years of American gun control never existed. Even normally interested but reasonable people lost all sense of logic. They were shrill in their zeal to stop any and all legislative attempts to manage our deadly gun problem.
There’s no hyperbole here. Among the thousands of phone calls and emails I’ve received from rabid, intractable gunners, more than just a few made it clear they want me and others like me silenced, gone or dead. The din of moon-howling paranoia and extortion has been daunting. And when pressed to suggest what we should do about the increasingly frequent and deadly massacres of people who go to school or a movie, the answer is either a bewildering “nothing” or that we just keep weapons out of the hands of crazy people.
That’s right. A growing group of people who don’t trust the government to handle health care, tax collection or proving the president was born in the United States wants to empower that same government to decide what crazy is, who’s crazy, and when that means you can no longer have access to guns. Yeah, right.
There’s no doubt Holmes is crazy. Only crazy people do such things. Whether he was “insane” at the time of the murders, well, that’s another story. But I have no doubt that crazy people are paranoid, convinced that others are plotting to harm them. Crazy people start building backyard bunkers or panic rooms. They collect guns, ammo and bombs because they think they need them to protect themselves from imagined threats. Crazy people make wild threats and accusations, sometimes as a last-minute plea for help.
You can see where this is going. It’s a chilling idea, allowing a government agency to look at us under a microscope and determine whether we’re just interested in guns and blowing off a little steam, or whether we’re the next James Holmes.
And you realize of course that in every case where some crazy person went on a rampage, someone knew they were crazy and in most cases even knew they had guns. I don’t think that makes them complicit in all these massacres, it’s just that hard to believe anyone could be so sadistic and sick.
The worst part? Even marginally mentally ill people would avoid seeking out help knowing that they’re going to bring a world of hurt and restrictions down upon them.
So are you going to turn in your uncle? Your father? Your husband when he starts stocking up on shells? When he orders the Kevlar camo gear? When he hears the soothing suggestions of Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh even when they’re not on the TV and radio? I doubt it. And I doubt that those who had a virtual nuclear meltdown over the wimpy gun laws recently passed in Colorado are going to be reasonable about determining who’s too mentally ill to have a gun, for how long, and how we can even hope to keep firearms out of their hands.
No, that kind of reason died in the movie theater across the street and in an elementary school classroom across the country last year.
Reach editor Dave Perry at 303-750-7555 or email@example.com
When my relatives start stocking up supplies, I look to them for guidance. Millions of Americans stockpile everything from food to fuel to ammo. Does that make them crazy or just more prepared for when crazy things happen. Look at the breakdown of society in New Orleans after Katrina. It has happened here before and only a fool would think that those things won’t happen again.
It’s foolish to put your safety and the safety of your family in the hands of others.
I also ask this, why do the worst massacres and the worst gun violence happen in the areas where guns are most restricted? (Chicago, Schools, Theaters) I bet you a coke, you can’t come up with a reasonable explanation that fits your fascist agenda.
Dave Perry your intolerance and ignorance of guns, gun safety, home protection and the reason behind the 2nd amendment is downright scary.
Fort Hood certainly had plenty of armed people there, it didn’t stop a massacre. Blaming gun violence on gun restrictions instead of the madmen and their lethally efficient weapons is truly crazy.
Mayan why do I sense that you have never been in the Military? On a Post or Base weapons are kept locked in a gun vault or secured area and the individual soldiers do not have access to those weapons nor do they carry weapons with the exceptions of the MP’s who are as close or as far away was the Police are. It may benefit you to know the subject matter prior to expounding baseless rhetoric.
I’ve actually spent as much of my life living on or near military installation as I have in primarily civilian areas. I’ve lived in no fewer than four U.S. army bases in my time; assuming lack of familiarity is a bad assumption to make. But supposing you’re correct about there being a shortage of “good guys with a gun,” the reliance on some fairytale CCW holder to stop every armed criminal is pure fantasy, just as it’s unwise to expect a police officer to be on every corner to stop a DV situation or robbery before it escalates into a situation where someone is shot and killed. My point is that we allow weapons of mass killing and (until recently) their ultra-capacity magazines in our society, and those weapons are used for one purpose: To kill and maim as many people as possible in as little time as possible. These weapons have no place beyond the theater of war.
99 Mass Shooting occurred between 1980 and 2010. All but one occurred in gun restricted areas. The only one that did not was the Gabby Giffords shooting. Of the shooting stopped by civilians there averaged 2.3 deaths. Of those stopped by 911 response there averaged 14.3 deaths.
Closer to home, Aurora had a mass shooting stopped by a CCW holder off Havana and Dartmouth. Also, the Colorado Springs church guard that stopped a mass shooting.
Banning those “ultra capacity” magazines did not prevent the three worst K-12 mass shootings before Sandy Hook. Erfurt Germany 18 students killed, Emsdetten Germany 11 high school students killed, Winneden Germany 15 killed, and the 77 kids killed in Norway. All areas that banned these high capacity magazines. Germany has some of the toughest gun laws in the world.
Your 100% correct we cannot rely on another, whether police or ccw holder to stop every armed criminal. So why wouldn’t you want to defend yourself with your own weapon? Lets put breathalyzers in every car because 10,000 people are killed by drunk drivers each year. Its the same idiotic philosophy to punish law abiding citizens for crimes committed by others.
Comments are closed.