
On any Friday night, there are a few dozen Aurora cops on the street, patrolling, answering calls, and doing cop stuff.
It seems that any of them able to get to a car rushed last week to a Friday night football game in north Aurora. Probably many, or most, expected the worst.
Aurora has seen the worst. It didn’t happen — this time.
What did happen is that near the end of the third quarter of the game between Rangeview and Vista PEAK Prep high schools, skirmishes broke out under the decades-old stands adjacent to Hinkley High School. It’s unclear still whether fighting spread to the stands themselves, or whether kids and parents were just immediately trying to see fighting that erupted into the parking lot.
Sentinel Sports Editor Courtney Oakes was covering the game, from across the field. He said it looked like people were suddenly running up and down the stands and from side to side, possibly to see something that coaches on the field and players were oblivious to. At that moment, Rangeview was losing big 31-0.
Oakes said it was impossible to discern what was happening, but something was definitely happening.
Someone called 911 to report shots fired, police said later, adding that they never saw any evidence of that.
But the call of a shooting at a high school football game immediately brought pretty much every available officer on wheels across the city racing to the stadium.
Officials canceled the remainder of the game abruptly, sending people home. Spectators there said it was nerve racking and chaotic.
No one was shot, or seriously injured, police said afterward.
One man, later identified as Raukeen Horton, 31, was arrested and now faces charges of disorderly conduct and obstruction.
And one juvenile at the game, unidentified, was arrested after police discovered that person had a gun. Police have released few details about that part of the night, but whoever it is faces charges of possession of a handgun by a juvenile, third-degree assault and possession of a large-capacity ammunition.
It was a loaded gun. An anomaly?
Please.
ESPN and USA Today last year both published stories about the rising problem of gun violence at high school sporting events. In his 2022 story “‘A quiet phenomenon’: The rise of gun violence at school sports,” ESPN reporter Michael A. Fletcher talked to students and educators about the increasing times these iconic events have turned into nightmares.
Since 1970, 285 people have been injured or killed by shootings at high -school sporting events, almost all of those in just the last five years, according to data compiled by K-12 School Shooting Database. There were 37 school sporting-event shootings last year, and 38 shootings in 2021.
Don’t ask why. Why not?
Aurora has been the site of two school shootings in the past few years. In both cases, high-school skirmish stuff, usually settled with tough talk and fists, were settled with guns, police say.
The last three Aurora police chiefs have pleaded with parents to connect with and rein in their kids, and especially their kids’ guns.
“Kids don’t have respect for authority or each other,” Aurora interim police Chief Art Acevedo said in a statement this week. “Luckily, the young man that had a handgun did not get a chance to use it, but we’ve seen too many times where that’s not the case. Parents need to pay attention to what their kids are doing.”
About two years ago, when parents rushed first to Aurora Central High School after a shooting in a nearby park, and then Hinkley High School, after a parking lot shooting there, then Police Chief Vanessa Wilson pleaded with parents to dive into their kids’ lives to stop increasing gun violence.
And here we are, two years later, now counting the number of teens shot, often by other teens, as if they were cases of the flu.
At least some Denver schools have had enough. At a recent Northfield High School football game at the Evie Dennis Campus in Denver, spectators had to pass through metal detectors and undergo some kind of search to get in.
It’s unclear what Cherry Creek and Aurora Public school districts might do, but after last Friday, doing nothing is just an invitation for the worst to actually happen.
“We are reviewing our game management protocols to ensure all future events can be enjoyed by district patrons,” APS spokesperson Corey Christiansen said in a statement. “We ask for our community’s support in preventing future disruptions to our games.”
No doubt. But given the increasing proclivity of kids across the region, and across the country, to carry and use guns, including at high school sporting events, and given the lack of gun laws and parent intervention to stop it, something else needs to be done to prevent the worst.
Of course, the expense, trouble and inconvenience of school districts vastly increasing security at football and basketball games seems like a ridiculous answer. But give the too-possible alternative, is there a compelling reason not to secure these fields and gyms?
Nope.
Get out your wallets, Aurora. This surely won’t come cheap.
But there are thousands of Aurora kids and their parents who not only deeply enjoy these athletics and the benefits they offer, endless kids parley their athleticism into college educations, depending on the games not being called due to violence, or worse.
High school football and basketball should be life-altering, not life-threatening.
It’s time to secure these events.
Follow @EditorDavePerry on Threads, Mastodon, Twitter and Facebook or reach him at 303-750-7555 or dperry@SentinelColorado.com
Ditto.
This guy talks out of both sides of his mouth…dont believe a thing he says
Or… the courts could actually inflict severe consequences on the teens and parents and adults who possess, use, or store a gun illegally. They are the cancer that must be excised if we hope to spare the rest of us from this senseless violence.
Athletic events are just the latest example of public places that can no longer be considered safe because of the possibility (likelihood?) of someone showing up and blasting away. Way past time for firearm registration and restrictions on volume gun and ammunition purchases. And how about some competency testing, licensing, and mandatory insurance coverage as part of gun purchases?
It really is not hard to fix this problem: just lock up the fools illegally carrying guns for at least a couple of decades. Contain the cancer! Our streets, schools, stadiums, and homes would get much safer very quickly.
The constant schizophrenic nature of the media and the public makes for sad outcomes. We don’t want cops anywhere and we want to punish them for things done in another state. We created a law that destroys the police and makes them all think about quitting. The grand antipolice efforts have resulted in the lowering of standards and the frantic hiring of young people who have been raised unable to deal with any insult or conflict. Many of the officers who have hung on are still thinking about finding better paying job with no risk that they will be prosecuted. The public has no idea what damage has been done. The liberalization of our courts has resulted in even less to fear from the justice system. Good luck addressing violence with no reason to fear any consequences. We talk about mass shootings but we are afraid to address the fact that the majority are young people, mostly black, shooting at each other. Until we are able to restore some semblance of a justice system we are in for a bad time. There is that cycle that is often quoted. Hard men make good times. Good times make weak men. Weak men make hard times. Repeat. We cannot begin to deal with the problems until we are honest about them.
One thing that has bugged me for a while is modern pundits using the phrase “that begs the question” when they really mean “that raises the question” or maybe “that leads us to the question,” just to save a syllable or two. The single-word paragraph, “Please.” however, gives us a textbook example of what I was taught, when I was in high-school, that begging the question is about. It means proving your point by pretending it is already proven, rather than offering solid reasoning or evidence.
I can sort of grin and bear it when one of the latest generation of “journalists,” trained under the educational system slated to have even more money thrown its way if Proposition HH passes, does that sort of thing. Yet I had hopes that the most senior editor of your entire media outlet might remember something from the old days when subjects like logic, debate, and even civics, were still taught in our schools.
Linguistic preferences is your contribution to this conversation?!?