FILE - In this Sunday, Oct. 4, 2015 file photo, a Syrian refugee child sleeps in his father's arms while waiting at a resting point to board a bus, after arriving on a dinghy from the Turkish coast to the northeastern Greek island of Lesbos. Bold ideas for helping Syrian refugees and their overburdened Middle Eastern host countries are gaining traction among international donors who were shocked into action by this year's migration of hundreds of thousands of desperate Syrians to Europe. (AP Photo/Muhammed Muheisen, File)

Time and again, President Obama has underestimated the scope, reach, and determination of ISIS. From calling them a “Junior Varsity” terrorist organization or naively stating that they have been “contained” diminishes his credibility at home and abroad. The coordinated use of both barbaric means such as beheading innocent civilians and mass executions by firing squad to the sophisticated delivery of planting bombs and mobilizing terrorist cells across Europe and, possibly the U.S., via technology and social media requires a new, aggressive and open-eyed approach to destroying ISIS and cutting off its tentacles for propaganda, recruitment and invasion into the Western civilized world.

Our safety at home should come before politics. While the Syrian refugee crisis is a human rights dilemma, we must balance our hearts with our heads. ISIS has used the mass migration of Syrian refugees to infiltrate Europe and many national security experts note that our porous Southern border could pose a real danger to soft targets across this great nation- including here in Colorado where Governor Hickenlooper maintains he will accept Syrian refugees.

Where and how should America handle the Syrian refugees resettlement? The answer for these refugees is their home, where their hearts are. It does not have to divide us in Colorado or throughout America. We are a caring nation of people that that strive to make a better life for our families by working hard and playing by the rules. We are able to, at least in part, because of the relative peace and civility by which our society exists.

ISIS must be defeated and we must be unafraid to go on living our way of life. These Syrian refugees should also be able to go on living their lives.

My time in the U.S. Navy working national security and geo-political matters taught me many things; the U.S. is at its best when we lead from a position of strength and we bring the world together to solve international problems. America must unite the world community around a safe and humanitarian solution by allowing these displaced men, women, and children to stay in their home region through safe zones protected and supported by the world community.

We all should acknowledge that these refugees are living in unsafe and war torn environments. We also should acknowledge that there is no full proof way of screening those refugees that would be sent to Colorado for potential threats to our homeland. That aside, it does not make sense to pull these people away from the country they know and love, when all the world need do is create a safe environment for them closer to home. The world community has a moral responsibility to help make the region more secure for these families.

We must also remember that we have to take care of our own as well. Charity starts at home. According to 2014 U.S. Census Bureau, America’s poverty rate is 14.8%. Put in real numbers, nearly 47 million Americans live in poverty today, that’s up from 2007. Many of them are children and veterans. We must do better.

Mark Krikorian wrote in the National Review that “the Center for Immigration Studies … calculates that it costs twelve times as much to resettle a refugee in the United States as it does to care for the same refugee in a neighboring country in the Middle East.” He goes on to point out that for every refugee we would bring to the United States, there are eleven others that are not being helped with that money.

Ryan Frazier

We can better help 12 times as many displaced Syrian refugee men, women, and children; closer to their own home, without the need to further risk our own security, and at a cost to our tax payers that gives us more bang for the buck. It is the safer, more humanitarian thing to do. Most importantly, it requires we lead the world community in doing it together.

Ryan Frazier is a former two-term Aurora city councilman. He recently announced he is seeking the Republican Party’s nomination for U.S. Senate in 2016.

11 replies on “FRAZIER: Syrian Refugee Resettlement: A safer, more humanitarian solution”

  1. Yes, build a ‘safe zone’ inside the Middle East, it’s much easier and less costly to do that, than to have them spread out all over Europe, stay home, protect the homeland.

  2. IRRELEVANT….you P.O.S. liberals voted for him…then want to snivel like little brats…you were warned that he was a P.O.S.

  3. Ryan, you can do better and should. This seems like just an editorial to get your name out there. I’d rather you go after Michael Bennet on all the misguided votes he’s made. When and if you become a U.S. Senator, you’re going to have to do better. That’s just the simple fact. So do it!

    1. HJD: Time and time again I hear people complain about candidates who only attack their opponent and never talk about the policies they would push in Washington. Are you really critical of him because he didn’t directly go after Bennet, but instead put forth an alternate solution to a problem? This is the problem with the political realm today, people are only concerned about scoring political points. I agree with you when it comes to Bennet’s record, but your criticism of Frazier on this one is way off……

  4. HJD: It makes sense to put the refugees in safe zones in their own countries.

    Maybe you should tell us what your brilliant idea is, rather than just being critical of Mr. Frazier. . JLT

  5. Great commentary!! To paraphrase the money is better spent on local Americans in need (veterans, homeless, and poor) than on refugees from Syria that can not be properly vetted. There is just simply no way to know if the Syrians being brought over were previous fighters and if so who they fought for. Let alone know what their real thoughts are towards the West and the USA. Help them out, but do it in the Middle East, not inside our borders. We have enough problems already.

    To add to what Mr. frazier said keep in mind that survey after survey shows that 30-70% of people in the Middle East are sympathetic to the Islamic State depending on the country. If it was only 2-3% I would have no problem letting some come here. No way it makes sense at 30% +. The region is just way too radicalized to let them come here. Also keep in mind that the majority (not ALL) of the Paris attackers were French born to recent Islamic immigrants. So not only do we have to worry about the refugees (who may be Isil plants, or Islamic Radicals), but we have to worry about their kids turning radical as they become adults. Of course some will say that won’t happen, but the fact is 1,000s (6,000 is the number according to Intelligence agencies) of Isil fighters have come from West. Europe, North America, etc. Most with Islamic roots. Having said all that, don’t make the mistake of assuming all Muslims are radicals, way too many are, but most are not.

Comments are closed.