
Don’t be fooled by false Medicaid narratives and empty tropes being promoted by the Trump administration — and fewer and fewer Congressional Republicans every day.
Elon Musk and other members of the Trump administration continue to promote false claims that the Medicaid rolls are choked with lazy people who won’t get jobs.
The reality of Medicaid is that either you, or someone you know, receives critical Medicaid benefits.
Medicaid was created to provide healthcare to people who suffer disabilities that prevent them from working. It provides medical care to people who virtually, and sometimes literally, have nothing.
In Colorado, Medicaid provides healthcare to people who work for wages so low they can’t afford even the leanest of health insurance policies, and, often, their employers don’t even offer them.

And in Colorado, where a stunning 1.17 million residents qualify for and use Medicaid, 65% of those recipients are already working. The reality of Colorado’s Health First Program, the name for Medicaid here, requires that a single person applying for benefits must make less than $20,800 a year. There’s some wiggle room for people with children of certain ages, but the rule, essentially, is that a family of four must have a family income under $45,600 a year to qualify for benefits.
These working poor Colorado residents live all over the state, and especially in rural Colorado — including rural communities where conservative Republicans run the show.
Not long after President Donald Trump was sworn into office, congressional Republicans identified about $880 million in “possible” cuts to the national Medicaid budget, about 10% of total Medicaid spending.
The reality of the needs for and benefits of Medicaid have prompted Republicans in Colorado, and across the nation, to warn fellow GOP leaders in Congress that they will not support a bill that proposes cuts to Medicaid, as GOP leaders mapped out earlier in the year. Newly elected Rep. Jeff Hurd, R-Grand Junction, signed a letter with 11 other GOP members of the House saying they will not back a budget bill with cuts to Medicaid.
Gov. Jared Polis, Aurora Rep. Jason Crow, state Treasurer Dave Young and many others have been consistent, and adamant, that a federal budget cut of around $900 billion that would roll downhill to Colorado. It would be catastrophic to the state economy, the health and welfare of hundreds of thousands of state residents, to the entire health care system, and especially to hospitals, clinics and programs in rural Colorado.
Here’s what to consider if you think Medicaid cuts won’t affect you.
Kim Bimstefer, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, pointed out this week in a meeting with the Sentinel that huge numbers of Medicaid recipients are elderly residents, and that two-thirds of all patients living in nursing homes pay for that life-saving care with Medicaid benefits.
With the cost of assisted living pushing far past $120,000 a year, tens of thousands of nursing home residents would be unable to afford such care without Medicaid. Many would become homeless and face certain death. Even if the state worked to accommodate the fiscal disaster, the cost of nursing home care for those without Medicaid would skyrocket.
The same thing would happen to hospitals across the state, and especially in rural areas, where hospitals already eke out a tenuous existence.
Ending Medicaid for hundreds of thousands of people in the state would end just about all their preventative care. Rather than Medicaid recipients costing the system a sensible charge for doctor office visits, these patients would have to resort to emergency room care, at a huge cost that, under state and federal law, would have to be absorbed by health and hospital systems, said Lt. Gov. Dianne Primavera.
“It would be disastrous,” she said, pointing out that hospitals would be forced to pass the cost onto paying customers, which would result in big hikes in health insurance premiums across Colorado.
Proposed cuts would decimate a wide range of live-saving care for hundreds of thousands of Colorado residents, jeopardize the state’s network of nursing homes and assisted living facilities, disrupt or even destroy rural hospitals and health care, and raise the cost of medical care for everyone.
Polis was right last week in admonishing Republicans from states that would suffer just as much or more and who stand quiet as the Trump administration pursues Medicaid cuts.
We agree with Polis, who said he backs the idea of a leaner, more efficient government, and reducing any and all legitimate wasteful spending.
“But this simply is not the area to cut,” Polis said.
It’s not enough for Colorado residents to just wince as Republicans march ahead with their dangerous plan. Reach out to friends and family in communities where GOP leaders have yet to offer the same realistic sensibility as Hurd.
Colorado GOP reps Lauren Boebert, Jeff Crank and Gabe Evans have yet to commit to the same logical position as Hurd.
Trump and congressional GOP leaders need to hear from their voters and supporters who understand this has nothing to do with partisan politics and only ensures the health and wellbeing of 94 million Americans, as well as protecting the wellbeing of the nation’s healthcare system.
In the absence of real universal healthcare, a critical benefit that only the United States, among wealthy nations, withholds from itself, solid and solvent Medicaid and Medicare systems are the best this nation can do.


The GOP decries single-payer healthcare, but when it comes to support for medical care for poor people, they say there is fat. You simply can’t have it both ways. The GOP props up business at the expense of the working poor and has done so for 50 years to the point of a handful of oligarch billionaires like Elon Musk controlling more than half of the wealth of this country! Yet, Trump is proposing more cuts in taxes for the very wealthy and for corporations. This is happening on the heels of our economy weathering the pandemic and emerging healthy, until the tariffs were imposed. Make no mistake, Trump has already justified the tax cut by touting the cuts to programs. This is a transfer of money to support the working poor to billionaires to buy more mansions and build their stock portfolio. Is that what Trump voters wanted? I don’t think so!
The cost between the FHITF revenue and the outlays for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services was $1.75 trillion in FY24. That was equal to the annual deficit. 50 years ago, the inflation-adjusted cost of a live birth and two days in a private hospital room was $1,000. Hospitals charge the insurance companies 25 times that now.
How about you quit chimping out with your fake class war appeals–which have no credibility given how much your side loves peacocking your socio-economic status over those lower on the ladder that don’t share your dumb political theology–and start advocating for things that will actually reduce that problem, like prosecuting fraudulent claims and breaking down medical monopolies by hospitals that charge $25,000 for something that cost $1,000 inflation-adjusted 50 years ago?
the feds need to cut Medicaid funds for Colorado, and subtract what has been spent on illegals.Colorado is out of hand with our big gay governor. Now they want to pass legislation revoking parental rights if they don’t agree with their “sexual-mental confusion”The children are allowed to call CPS on their parents and this is being taught in “clubs” that schools allow. I live in Colorado. My husband was disabled in 2003 and that is what our SS is determined by.We out $370 a month plus I pay a gap plan at 178 a month. So I might have a few hundred dollars left after that.BUT I DO NOT QUALIFY FOR MEDICAID even though I have stage 4 cancer and my bills are gi-normous. I am an American, born in the Cradle of Liberty in Philadephia ,PA. What should I do?Go to Denver and pretend I’man illegal? I would get free housing, food stamps and Medicaid. Tell me,what is this country coming to, Biden and Obama trashed the true American.
Nice, you slipped “big gay governor” in there when it is entirely irrelevant to the discussion.
Nothing like a little superfluous ad hominem to distract from the topic.
Hey Jeff, kind of reminds me of how Dave Perry writes. So many adjectives and so little time. But I do like your use of “big” words. Shows some education, I think.
Ad hominem runs rampant in the Sentinel Blog and it’s comments. One reason that I continue to read this website. Fit’s my nasty, when mostly, I could care less!
The unconscionable cuts proposed by the Republican budget include cuts to SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program–aka food stamps), one of the first links in our safety net, providing food to the very poor in our country. In Colorado, 584,500 residents receive assistance (about 1 in 10). The current average SNAP benefit is $6.11 per person per day, an amount hardly sufficient to provide adequate nourishment for anyone. With all the talk about drastic cuts to Medicaid (which I agree would be disastrous), we must also protect the SNAP program. There is no health without food. These SNAP benefits go directly into our local economy, generating $1.50 in economic activity for every $1 of SNAP benefits. I do not see how the proposed cuts to SNAP and Medicaid can possibly be justified to provide tax cuts for the wealthy.
$880 million in cuts for waste and fraud is only 0.001 of total Medicaid spending annually, which amounts to $880 billion—a drop in the bucket. Readers deserve more than doom-and-gloom reporting, and taxpayers are undeserving of the radical left’s scare tactics and reckless spending.