There were no surprises in two studies released last week focusing on how much it would really take to get Colorado kids successfully to graduation day.
The Colorado Legislature commissioned two consultant groups to tell state lawmakers and education officials the price for getting the bulk of Colorado kids where they need to be in school.
It’s a lot.
The two intensive studies agreed that Colorado needs to spend between $3.5 billion to $4.1 billion more each year above the $10 billion a year it already spends on public education.
After years of reporting on the challenges that school districts like Aurora Public Schools, Cherry Creek, Denver Public Schools, Adams School District 14 and Jeffco schools face in trying to push kids to succeed in school, every day, every year and through graduation, the lack of resources is startlingly clear.

For decades, research and data have shown that children who come from more stable, more wealthy families who have the ability to spend more time focusing on their children’s education and well-being do far better in school than other students.
In a world where the cost of living makes living almost a luxury and parents must work more and still have less for their families, the only reliable safety net in the state are public schools.
It was decades ago that scientists determined that the earlier a child is stimulated by educational themes and ideas, even in infancy, the more likely they are to do well in school and succeed in their careers.
Years ago, federal Head Start programs showed that preschool programs for everyone helped level the playing field later in life by literally giving young children a head start on the road to being successful in life.
But decades of research has also solidly proven that kids who don’t regularly go to school, or who move from school to school, or don’t have families pushing them to learn, or don’t have enough to eat, or a home they feel safe in, or kids who speak a language other an English at home, or don’t have to access to books, or struggle with their families in poverty, these kids more easily fall behind. The younger they fall behind, the more likely it is they won’t graduate.
That was 30 years ago, before the onset of extreme social media, the pandemic and a world that has added new and sometimes crushing stresses on children.
And despite all the talk of public “safety nets” to help children whose families are unable or unwilling to help themselves, the only real safety net in Colorado are public schools.
So many lawmakers and others wrongly insist that the state “buckle down” and focus on the “Three R’s” in an unrealistic push for “back to basics.” This wrongheaded assessment overlooks that we have created a society where schools, and only schools, can and must provide a full range of health and social services to children, because no one else can or will. Schools have become not just food centers for hungry children, but food banks for entire families as well.
Schools have become centers of law enforcement, drug-abuse resistance education, childcare, healthcare and mental-health care.
Schools have become surrogate parenting programs, ensuring children make it to school or have the technical resources they need to learn to live and work in a technical world.
Schools are career centers where we expect pricey college-like facilities to give children a leg up in the work world by sending them from high school armed with all kinds of job training.
We expect public schools to prepare children for college whether they enter public schools at 16 unable to speak English or come to school from homes where they’re allowed to play video games until they fall asleep at night and scroll through TikTok until their minds are numb.
Schools should be responsible for all those things. Taking care of children’s health and mental health needs, ensuring they have the resources they need to learn and the encouragement to pursue curiosity and learning makes for healthier, happier adults. And it makes for healthier adults who need far less government-paid services for their entire lives.
The science has long been clear: Investing in children through education saves taxpayer dollars and makes for better, safer communities.
But the cost of this safety net is higher than what Colorado carves out for it, and these two studies have now shown that.
Now, it’s up to state lawmakers, Gov. Jared Polis and the residents of Colorado.
We can accept the facts and the science, and provide schools with what they must have, so they can deliver what all of us need from public schools.
Or we can stay on a path that costs billions every year and continues to fail at what we’ve set out to do.


This article is full of correlations without causations. This means that while one or more factors occur together, they do not necessarily cause one another. Throwing more and more money into poorly performing schools is like dumping money down a bottomless pit. American schools under-perform those in other nations despite spending at least 3 times the funding.
The real reasons for the poor performance of our schools are teacher unions who mainly serve to protect underperforming teachers and focus more on feelings and activism than teaching educational basics. The other primary factor is parents who are uninvolved in their children’s education and view schools simply as free daycare. More money won’t solve these core problems.
“The real reasons for the poor performance of our schools are teacher unions who mainly serve to protect underperforming teachers and focus more on feelings and activism than teaching educational basics.”
What is the source information for this statement?
“Waiting For Superman” is a good place to start. Is it so hard to believe that a union would put its interests above all else? We have one of the most expensive education systems in the world but our K-12 performance is in the dumps. Where does all that money go?
Teachers’ unions have never supported any form of school reform. They hate charter schools, vouchers, and accountability standards because these threaten their bottom line – money they make from having a big union. Greed. Simple as that.
And don’t get me started on phonics (TLDR: They replaced phonics with something much worse, waited 30 years before realizing their mistake, then brought it back under a new name).
Walt, Kirk is whistling Dixie. A common BS line in red states is to blame unions for policing problems, teaching failures, and any other societal ills. The problem here is outlined in the article. I’m 70, so my school experience was different than today. Parents were expected to discipline their kids when I was growing up in Iowa. I remember thinking that my Dad was a little too eager to do so. Parents either provided a sack lunch or bought warm school meals. Today we have many parents who work two or three jobs and still can’t afford lunch for their children, so it’s on the school. Parents want to blame teachers for the poor behavior of their kids, so that goes on the school. If their child does poorly in school, the teacher or the school is failing, not the parent who doesn’t set aside study time. My daughter is a Science teacher as well as department head. She loves her job, her kids, and her coworkers, but when I hear about the expectations she encounters, I wonder how she keeps her head up! I had two girls. My wife and I were on the same page. Studying was a must. When there were parent/teacher conferences, we always made time to go. I remember teachers saying, “Why are you here? Your kids are doing great.” I remember thinking, “That’s why I’m here. I want to keep it going!”
Thank you for this passionate defense of schools’ important role in society’s success and stability. More money is needed for the labor-intense work of educating children. Colorado needs to fund schools at a level that will pay for better prepared teachers, more teachers, smaller classes, more counseling, and more individual tutoring.
I guess these big-brained analysts never heard of the Kansas City Schools experiment. NGO grift incoming.
Cutting Medicaid to fund education makes sense. Much better to unvest in our next generation than in a meth-head’s teeth or an addict’s organ transplant or a shooter’s hospital bill.
Medicaid is pure debt. There’s no funding to “cut” because it has no dedicated revenue stream. In fact, the delta between the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund revenue and the outlays of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services nearly equaled the national deficit in FY24.
Did I miss something? What happened to the tax money from the sale of marijuana going to the schools?