This isn’t your father’s Aurora anymore, and political leaders need to take heed of that fact.

The days of a go-along, get-along suburb to the east are long, long gone, and this week’s General Election highlights that.

Aurora, once a Republican stronghold for the most part, would now be an inhospitable place to the likes of former Sen. Bill Armstrong, at one time heralded as a political demigod in these parts.

With a state legislative delegation of 10 seats, only two representatives, hailing from Brighton and Greenwood Village, are Republicans. Of these delegates, Greenwood Village Republican Spencer Swalm, Brighton Republican Kevin Priola, Aurora Democrat Jovan Melton and John Buckner are men. And of the 10 representatives, three are black.

Aurora has become the home of a majority of progressive voters, leaning to the left and insisting their elected representatives follow suit. City voters mirrored the state this week when slightly more than half voted for President Barack Obama.

Likewise, voters in Aurora sided with the majority in the state by agreeing to Amendment 64, seeking to end marijuana prohibition laws in Colorado.

The one diversion from this trend was the election of incumbent Republican Congressman Mike Coffman. Coffman has a voting record that mocks what the majority of Aurora residents honor when it comes to many social issues such as abortion rights, gay rights and views on social programs. But Coffman has a long and storied history in Aurora as a veteran politician who’s held many seats and titles. He’s well-liked and came to the race as an well-funded incumbent.

While Coffman gained ground with local voters by pushing his non-traditional stance on wasteful Pentagon spending, the race between him and Denver Democrat Joe Miklosi focused on Coffman’s considerable conservative stance and voting record. He must now find a way to justify future votes on women’s reproductive rights, gay rights and immigration reform with a political party intolerant of deviance and a constituent base often at odds with the political demands of U.S. House Republican leadership.

Coffman is not alone in having to look long and hard at how Aurora has changed over the last two decades. City lawmakers, too, need to see how the community has changed.

Since Aurora residents supported pot legalization Amendment 64, city council representatives will need to keep voter intentions in mind should the legal marijuana issue end up on the council floor.

It almost certainly will in some way. Most likely, courts will tie up the state issue as federal officials move in to remind everyone that federal law prohibits the sale and use of marijuana. It will be some time before the issue is resolved.

In the meantime, voters were clear in wanting to end the days of making the “recreational” use marijuana a criminal issue. It’s almost certain that during this gray period in the law, that city officials will have to decide how to handle marijuana law infractions, and whether they should guide police procedures.

How lawmakers from Highland’s Ranch would handle the issue — where voters opposed Amendment 64 — would be very different from those in Aurora, where voters backed the measure.

Finally, as the new Congress and state Legislature move forward, there is little doubt both groups will be handling the issue of illegal immigration. Both the state and the U.S. House have previously defeated measures that would extend some higher education benefits to illegal immigrants raised in the United States. Aurora, and the entire country, needs to find a way to bring many of these long-time residents into the fold of our community, making them legitimate neighbors accountable to tax and other laws, just like the rest of us.

Really, the issues haven’t changed, but Aurora has over the years. The city has grown up to be a place where voters want results based on compassion and practicality. Voters did their part this week, not it’s time for those elected to get their part of the job done.

5 replies on “EDITORIAL: Aurora voters have now become a community of progressive interest”

  1. Shame on the Aurora Sentinel. You should be an unbiased news organization that serves the community. How can you claim to give us accurate news when you write opinion articles like this. Your practically gloating on the election results. This is a very diverse community with differing opinions on everything. Many of us enjoy that about Aurora. To say that politicians should only look left simply because they won a slight majority insults the large minority. Your paper mirrors that sad state of modern journalism.

    Jason

    1. It sounds as though the Aurora Sentinel is spouting sour grapes because
      its endorsed candidate did not win the 6th congressional district.
      Apparently, the northern part of the city may not be as “progressive” as
      the editors hoped. Adams County voters gave more of their votes to Coffman than any of his opponents. The new 6th CD is not the fiefdom of the City of Aurora. Highlands Ranch residents, in Douglas County, are still a significant force in the district. They gave Coffman nearly a 13,000 vote edge that his opponents were never able to overcome. Littleton, Greenwood Village, Centennial, Brighton, and parts of Thornton are communities in the new district and are not as “progressive” as the editorial staff of the Sentinel want to imagine Aurora is.

  2. I went on Mike Coffman’s Congressional website and he hasn’t updated the map of the 6th Congressional District to include Aurora. Let’s hope that this is just an oversight and that he realizes he is representing a very different constituency than Douglas County republicans.

    1. Coffman shouldn’t be “updating” the map of the 6th Congressional District on his website just yet because the new boundaries don’t come into being until January 3, 2013. What you see there today is quite accurate. The people we voted for this month — from county officials to president — don’t actually take office until January. New legislative districts, at the state and federal level, go into effect this January. In the meantime, everything is just as it was at this time last year. Kudos to Coffman for not “jumping the gun” to appease those who choose to be uninformed.

  3. The newspaper have no shame in siding with the criminal democrats in stealing peoples money under the disquise that they are on the side of the blacks and latinos and have the gall to make the reader feel like thats the side to be on.

Comments are closed.