Sign up for our free Sentinel email E-ditions to get the latest news directly in your inbox.
The Sentinel not only cares deeply about bringing our readers accurate and critical news, we insist all of the crucial stories we provide are available for everyone — for free.
Like you, we know how critical accurate and dependable information and facts are in making the best decisions about, well, everything that matters. Factual reporting is crucial to a sound democracy, a solid community and a satisfying life.
So there’s no paywall at SentinelColorado.com. Our print editions are free on stands across the region, and our daily email E-ditions are free just for signing up, to anyone.
But we need your help to carry out this essential mission.
Please help us keep the Sentinel different and still here when you need us, for everyone. Join us now, and thank you.
FILE - In this Feb. 13, 2016, file photo, people stand on the steps of the Supreme Court at sunset in Washington. Seven years before Thomas Sims defended Sammie Stokes in a South Carolina death-penalty trial, he had prosecuted Stokes for assaulting his ex-wife. The trial record shows Sims never told the judge in the murder case about that earlier prosecution, not even when the ex-wife took the stand against his client to recount the assault. Stokes’ case is one of two the Supreme Court is weighing in which death-row inmates are raising questions about the actions of their lawyers. (AP Photo/Jon Elswick, File)
WASHINGTON | The Supreme Court has denied appeals from death row inmates in Louisiana and South Carolina who questioned their lawyers’ actions.
FILE – In this Feb. 13, 2016, file photo, people stand on the steps of the Supreme Court at sunset in Washington. Seven years before Thomas Sims defended Sammie Stokes in a South Carolina death-penalty trial, he had prosecuted Stokes for assaulting his ex-wife. The trial record shows Sims never told the judge in the murder case about that earlier prosecution, not even when the ex-wife took the stand against his client to recount the assault. Stokes’ case is one of two the Supreme Court is weighing in which death-row inmates are raising questions about the actions of their lawyers. (AP Photo/Jon Elswick, File) FILE – In this Feb. 13, 2016, file photo, people stand on the steps of the Supreme Court at sunset in Washington. Seven years before Thomas Sims defended Sammie Stokes in a South Carolina death-penalty trial, he had prosecuted Stokes for assaulting his ex-wife. The trial record shows Sims never told the judge in the murder case about that earlier prosecution, not even when the ex-wife took the stand against his client to recount the assault. Stokes’ case is one of two the Supreme Court is weighing in which death-row inmates are raising questions about the actions of their lawyers. (AP Photo/Jon Elswick, File)
The justices on Monday did not comment on the cases of James Tyler of Louisiana and Sammie Stokes of South Carolina.
Tyler’s lawyer conceded his client’s guilt in the hope of drawing a life sentence, even though Tyler repeatedly objected to that strategy y.
Stokes’ lawyer had previously prosecuted him for assaulting his ex-wife. The lawyer never informed the judge of his earlier role, not even when the ex-wife took the stand against Stokes.