President Barack Obama meets with members of his cabinet in the Cabinet Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, July, 26, 2012. From left are, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, Secreatry of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, the president and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

CENTENNIAL | If President Barack Obama wins this swing-voting state, and a second term as president, voters like Paula Burky will probably be the reason.

“He understands women,” said Burky, a Westminster resident who last month decided to vote for Obama.

President Barack Obama meets with members of his cabinet in the Cabinet Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, July, 26, 2012. From left are, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, Secreatry of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, the president and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Both the Democratic president and his Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, see women — specifically suburbanites from their 30s to their 50s — as critical to victory in Colorado as well as in other hard-fought places like Virginia and Nevada where polls also show close contests. That means this group of voters may also hold the key to winning the White House.

The state of the campaign in the sprawling Denver region — modest neighborhoods and upscale subdivisions near the city give way to retail complexes, industrial parks and front-range ranches at the outskirts — illustrates how the fight is playing out across the nation, and how both candidates are seeking to woo these female voters in different ways.

Obama has stirred passions among Colorado women by stoking fears about abortion rights, spending the past few weeks sharply criticizing Romney in ads for proposing to eliminate funding for Planned Parenthood and opposing the Supreme Court’s landmark Roe v. Wade decision.

Romney, in turn, has paid for mail and automated calls in Colorado decrying Obama’s handling of the sluggish economy’s effect on women.

Just over 100 days until the election, polls in Colorado show a close race, though it’s unclear how the electorate’s psyche will be impacted by last week’s shooting massacre at a suburban Denver movie complex and a summer wildfire season that has scorched countless homes and businesses.

For now at least, Obama has had the edge over female voters nationally and he is focusing on a particularly promising subset: college-educated women. Fifty-five percent of college-educated women preferred Obama in a June Associated Press-GfK poll, while 40 percent preferred Romney.

Women with college degrees make up 27 percent of Colorado voters, according to exit polls from the 2008 election, higher than the national average of 23 percent. That puts Colorado in league with other prime Romney-Obama targets, Virginia and New Hampshire.

Burky is among those who have gravitated toward Obama. She and her husband were unemployed for eight months until recently, while their teenage daughter was recovering from cancer. Burky was swayed by Obama’s action last spring — opposed by Romney — to make it easier for women to obtain birth control, a move she said has economic repercussions.

“If women are choosing abortion because they are in dire economic straits, I have a moral obligation to vote for the candidate who is going to help them,” Burky said.

Jill Wildenburg, an Obama supporter who lives in Englewood, calls the president’s focus “huge because if women’s reproductive rights are marginalized, then women are marginalized.”

To press his argument that he’s on the side of women, Obama sponsored a national women’s summit last month in Colorado — in Jefferson County — featuring senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett and “Desperate Housewives” actress Eva Longoria. The week before he dispatched first lady Michelle Obama to Arapahoe High School in Centennial.

Obama is partly borrowing from the playbook of Colorado Democrat Michael Bennet’s winning U.S. Senate race in 2010. Bennet narrowly beat Ken Buck after painting him as extreme in pointed TV ads about the Republican’s opposition to abortion rights and popular forms of birth control. He carried Arapahoe and Jefferson counties by a combined 10,000 votes, about a third of his narrow margin over Buck.

“That portrayal of Buck is what beat him,” said Democratic pollster Paul Harstad, an adviser to Bennet who also does polling for Obama’s campaign.

Some Romney backers argue that Obama is attempting to distract female voters from the economy by emphasizing abortion.

“It has nothing to do with abortion,” said Vickie Dow of Centennial, an upscale Arapahoe County suburb. “I’m worried about the economy. I’m really afraid things have gone downhill terribly.”

Unemployment in Colorado was 8.2 percent in June, the same as nationally. It has ticked up slightly statewide and proportionally in Arapahoe and Jefferson counties, Denver’s south and west suburbs where more than 20 percent of the state’s population lives, after a slow decline over the past year when it dipped below the national average.

Romney, meanwhile, is seeking to court women like Debbie Brown of Centennial. She agrees with Republican pollsters who say that women are more acutely aware of economic ups and downs. Often household budget managers, women are more sensitive to fluctuations in the economy and see them as destabilizing to their families.

“It actually becomes a heart issue for them because they care so much about their families,” said Brown, whose husband recently began working again after being unemployed for nine months.

Four years ago, Obama carried Colorado, which offers nine Electoral College votes, by 9 percentage points. The outcome in November is expected to be much closer, with recent public polls showing a tight race.

Romney views Colorado, which Republicans carried in every presidential election from 1968 to 2004, as a valuable potential pick-up. Obama aides argue that his 2008 victory is proof the Southwest’s Republican trend is changing as Latinos, who typically vote Democratic, increase in numbers.

The candidates and their allies have combined to spend roughly $25 million in television advertising in Colorado — split nearly evenly between the two.

___

Deputy Director of Polling Jennifer Agiesta contributed to the report from Washington.

4 replies on “Obama and Romney fight for suburban women in Colorado”

  1. WOMEN….it’s not a us against them mentallity or how cool they appear….clearly Obama doesn’t know how to run a country…never in history has the figures been this bad……he has a first for all the bad records he has set…highest debt…most people on food stamps in history…most people collecting disability and unemployment payments in history…1st president to have countries credit rating downgraded…has played class warfare and has programmed poor people to hate rich people…so that means don’t you ever think your going to make any money or your going to have it taken away…oh yea…it will happen just like that….he has never had a job or bussiness…these are facts….over 8% unemployment for almost 4 years….blacks and hispanics have the hightest rates for unemplyment in history…did you hear me?  In history….NO OBAMA…we can’t take it nomore.

  2. It would be interesting to get Mitt Romney’s views on Sonia Johnson.  SONIA JOHNSON born Sonia Ann Harris, was a fifth-generation Mormon.  In 1977, Sonia began speaking out in support of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA).  She and other Mormon women founded the organization called Mormons for ERA.  She received national attention in her 1978 testimony before the United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Property Rights,  and she continued speaking and promoting the ERA and denouncing the LDS Church’s opposition to the amendment.  Soon afterward the LDS church began disciplinary excommunication proceedings against Johnson after her delivery of the speech “Patriarchal Panic: Sexual Politics in the Mormon Church” at a meeting of the American Psychological Association (APA).  An excommunication letter in late 1979 listed her misdeeds.

  3. Simple question to ask both candidates: (1) Just what has Obama done for women between 2008 and now? Lot of promises, and blamed Bush for everything done in preceding 8 years before 2008. Yet he continued everyone one of those policies, and made them worse. (2) Now ask Romney how many women are working in those companies he and investors took over management, made them larger and more profitable, with ever so many more employees (both male and female). Started with one small store, and STAPLES is a large, profitable, full employment company. Just to mention one. And I noticed those companies are in U.S. while Romney had other investments off-shore. Smart to bank off-shore, same as Obama Cabinet Officers, since this Administration was raiding every “piggy bank” they could find. SEPERATE ITEM: Rep. Akin is vastly the better choice than Sen. McCaskill, who votes the WH policies. This hurts seniors, veterans, and in the long run entire U.S. population. We don’t need a welfare country.

  4. The first bill President Obama signed was the Lilly Ledbedder Act that protected equal pay for women in the work place.
    He nominated and placed two women on the Supreme Court.
    He passed the constitutional Affordable Care Act that means women and their
    children will have health coverage. Children with pre existing conditions can NOW
    be covered.
    Children can remain on their parent’s health care until age 26.
    Seniors now have no co pay on preventive services, such as routine health
    screenings, mamograms, cervical cancer screenings. By encouraging
    preventive care, it will keep the cost of health services down.
    Insurance companies now have to use 80 percent of monies received on
    health services instead of marketing and high CEO salaries. Many citizens
    have received checks from their insurance companies who did not do this.
    By using 715 million dollars from Medicare, the Affordable Care Act extended
    Medicare coverage for another 8 years, and closed the donut hole for
    seniors when it comes to purchasing prescription drugs, and uses these
    funds to aggressively go after fraud in the system. No benefits will be
    reduced for those on Medicare. In fact, the services will be expanded through
    no co pays for preventive care.
    If Romney takes this 715 million dollars OUT of medicare, the benefits
    described above will be taken away from medicare, as well as children
    who are now covered with pre existing conditions.
    So when you hear that President Obama RAIDED medicare, please inform yourself on this obvious inaccurate description, and learn the truth.

Comments are closed.