Angie Riberia, head of the Neuroscience program who worked closely with suspected movie theater shooter James Holmes, listens during a news conference Monday, July 23, 2012, in Aurora, Colo. The conference was called to discuss the program, procedure and policy that surround the Neuroscience program that James Holmes was recently enrolled in before allegedly killing 12 and injuring dozens of others in a shooting at an Aurora movie theater last Friday. University officials won't say whether they saw any signs of academic or behavioral trouble in Holmes. (AP Photo/Barry Gutierrez)

AURORAUniversity of Colorado officials refused to release any significant details Monday on their yearlong association with James Holmes, the former neuroscience graduate student accused of killing 12 people at a midnight movie in Aurora.

Law enforcement authorities have said Holmes was stockpiling weapons even as he was enrolled in a prestigious neuroscience graduate program at the University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus.

University officials called a news conference Monday at which they said law enforcement officials had asked them refrain from talking about the case. University officials also have cited privacy laws in not releasing details of Holmes’ academic record.

“We are not trying to be evasive. We’re trying to be as transparent as we can,” said Lilly Marks, vice president for health affairs.

Yet question after question went unanswered. Little bits of information trickled past the refusals to answer, but for the most part, the news conference was marked by a lack of news.

The school’s silence has heightened the mystery surrounding Holmes, whom friends and acquaintances in his native California described as smart and reserved. After graduating from the University of California-Riverside, Holmes enrolled in the competitive graduate neuroscience program in June 2011. He won winning a prestigious National Institutes of Health grant that paid a $26,000 stipend in addition to tuition.

Holmes, 24, resigned without explanation from the program June 10, the university said on Sunday.

On Monday, Barry Shur, dean of the university’s graduate school, described the doctoral program as a close-knit group in which professors keep close tabs on their students.

“This is a family. It’s a team-building, family environment,” Shur said. “(Professors) are very much in contact with the students in the program … especially any student who might have academic or other difficulties,” he said.

If professors have concerns about a student’s well-being, Shur said, “we would expect faculty to reach out to support services.”

That only raised further questions about Holmes’ association with students and faculty at the sprawling campus in Aurora — and why several faculty members contacted by The Associated Press said the university had told them not to comment.

Shur denied that. He said the school had told students and faculty they could refer reporters to the university’s public relations office.

“We told them that they have every right to interact with the media if they choose,” Shur said.

After Friday’s shootings, the university also pulled web pages related to the neuroscience program from its website. Those pages can now be accessed only with a university password. Jacque Montgomery, a spokeswoman for the medical school, said that was done at the request of faculty and staff who wanted to protect their privacy after the shootings.

Shur did say that Holmes left blank a line on a form in which he would give a reason for his departure. Department officials encouraged him to fill it out, but he didn’t return the paperwork, Shur said.

Don Elliman, chancellor of CU-Denver, defended the school’s interactions with Holmes.

“To the best of our knowledge at this point, we think we did everything that we should have done,” he said.

A frustrated reporter asked why the school couldn’t provide the level of detail that Virginia Tech University did about a student who shot and killed 32 people and wounded 17 others in 2007.

“Are there any other questions?” Elliman replied.

5 replies on “CU officials defend doctoral program but remain mum on theater shooting suspect”

  1. I commend the university for their resraint in releasing infomation. There is no reason to divuldge info that may hurt the chance of this sob getting the chair. And besides as an average person, i am getting sick of the press focusing so much attention on him, WHO CARES!

  2. ‘They’ teach them ‘anything, anywhere, anytime’ and you wonder why now they are silent?

    The cops had this guy with weapons and should have delivered swift justice at that point, now millions of dollars will be spent ‘defending’ this piece of human garbage.  Nathan Dunlap cold-bloodedly murdered 4 people 14 years ago and the latest outrage is that he and the other two sentenced to death are now awaiting their fate in Sterling Correction Facility,  the ACLU proved it was against their civil rights to be denied their fair share of sunshine.  And people think this latest garbage should get the death penalty, THERE IS NO DEATH PENALTY IN COLORADO.

  3. well you must know much of this lose of life might have been prevented if just one person had been armed when is it going to sink in that law-abiding people have a need in something like this to be able to use deadly force to stop this Thug -who thought it good to shot and kill women & little children UN-armed with no defense these thugs are the reason for the second amendment they knew back in 1791  The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution is the part of the United States Bill of Rights that  right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. we the people (law -Abiding) when it becomes necessary to defend our selves and those around us must be lawfully armed because the sad thing is when law enforcement gets there we are already SHOT — my thinking would be America Arm your selves to be able to intervene in a case like this but do it Lawfully –be part of the solution—- not part of the problem —My heart goes out to these people and there family’s

  4. If you all didn’t sue each other to death you probally wouldn’t be having info problems.

Comments are closed.