AURORA | The Cherry Creek School District board of education is set to vote next month on whether to allow a new charter school to open — a move that could double the number of charters in CCSD and is sparking some controversy.
Backers of Heritage Heights Academy — which would be located in southeast Aurora — say it would fill a vital niche in a community where thousands of students are on a waiting list for the district’s lone charter school, Cherry Creek Academy on the district’s west side. Cherry Creek Academy’s wait list has about 3,300 students on it, according to the school, more than five times the size of the 570-student school.

But some say they are leery of Academica, the south Florida-based management firm — which has raked in millions of taxpayer dollars and is under federal investigation — tapped to administer the new school.
If the board approves the charter application for Heritage Heights Academy at their Oct. 12 meeting, the school would open next fall with about 460 students from kindergarten to sixth grade. By the school’s fifth year, backers hope to have about 690 students from kindergarten to eighth grade.
Backers have yet to find a building, but Jen Gibbons, one of the school’s founders, said they are focused on properties near E-470 and Smoky Hill Road and are already working with a real estate agent.
Gibbons said the school will follow the “core knowledge” curriculum used at Cherry Creek Academy and several other charters around the state. According to Gibbons’ application to CCSD, the curriculum uses a “detailed outline of grade-by-grade content to be taught, but leaves the specifics of how to teach open to the creativity and expectations of the individual schools.”
Gibbons said the school is needed because Cherry Creek Academy’s wait list is so long. She said her children were on the list for several years before she enrolled them in charter schools in Douglas County. She estimates several hundred families from CCSD have made a similar move to send their children to charters outside the district because they can;t get in at Cherry Creek Academy.
Backers of Heritage Heights Academy — which would be located in southeast Aurora — say it would fill a vital niche in a community where thousands of students are on a waiting list for the district’s lone charter school, Cherry Creek Academy on the district’s west side. Cherry Creek Academy’s wait list has about 3,300 students on it, according to the school, more than five times the size of the 570-student school.
In its first year, Heritage Heights would have a budget of about $3 million, almost all of it coming from $7,246 in tax dollars for each student.
If those students are from Cherry Creek — as Gibbons estimates the vast majority could be — that money would otherwise flow to CCSD.
Still, Gibbons said, she doesn’t expect the school to be a drain on CCSD’s finances. She claims many of the students will be students who would otherwise leave the district for a charter, be home schooled or attend a private school.
Academica, which operates more than 100 charter schools, primarily in Florida but also in Utah, California and other states, has been criticized in recent years for its business dealings. According to a Miami Herald investigation in 2011, the for-profit company pulled in more than $158 million in annual revenue.
The company has been criticized for having conflict of interests with people close to Academica serving on boards for individual charters, as well as for lucrative real estate dealings in south Florida. Those issues resulted in a federal investigation last year into Academica’s practices.
A spokesperson for the company did not return a call for comment.
Dean Titterington, who founded Cherry Creek Academy in 1995, said he “whole heartedly” supports a similar charter school opening on the east side of CCSD. And he said the plan Gibbons and her team have presented is mostly solid.
Gibbons said the school is needed because Cherry Creek Academy’s wait list is so long. She said her children were on the list for several years before she enrolled them in charter schools in Douglas County. She estimates several hundred families from CCSD have made a similar move to send their children to charters outside the district because they can;t get in at Cherry Creek Academy.
“I think the organizing group has it exactly right with their curriculum choices — core knowledge, Singapore math — and for all the right reasons,” he said.
But he has concerns about Academica.
For one, Titterington said, the school could be managed without the help of an outside agency, just the way Cherry Creek Academy is. That setup keeps parents as close as possible to all decision making, one of the benefits of a charter school in the first place, he said.
And the company’s past issues with potential conflicts of interests are concerning, he said.
“They may not be planning on doing that here, but it is a red flag,” he said.
Tustin Amole, a spokeswoman for CCSD, said the district has questions about Academica, including about the federal investigation and its management practices. She said the district also needs the proposed school’s budget to be finalized and for them to find a building before anything can be finalized.
“I don’t want to say we have concerns until we have all the answers,” she said.
Ilana Spiegel, who has four children who attend Cherry Creek schools, said she is generally “agnostic” about charter schools as a concept, but she opposes the application from Heritage Heights.
Spiegel said her chief concerns are with Academica, in part because the company’s services — such as facilities management and long-range planning — are already handled at the district level, which seems like an inefficient use of resources.
“And I have concerns about who they would be accountable to and how transparent they would be in their finances,” she said.
The company has been criticized for having conflict of interests with people close to Academica serving on boards for individual charters, as well as for lucrative real estate dealings in south Florida. Those issues resulted in a federal investigation last year into Academica’s practices.
But Gibbons said the concerns about Academica are overblown. For one, she said the company would largely provide “back-office support” such as lawyers and office managers. And the company would be working with Heritage Heights on a one-year contract so if the school’s local board of directors — which Gibbons said will make all decisions about the school — doesn’t like the company’s work, they can dump them after a year.
Gibbons said she estimates the school will pay Academica about $450 per student per year, and CCSD about $420 per student per year for making sure the school adheres to state standards, but those numbers won’t be finalized until an agreement is reached.
As for the criticism of Academica, Gibbons chalked that up to the company’s success making it an easy target.
“People are uncomfortable with people doing well and making money,” she said.

I would like to clarify a couple of things in this article. I told Brandon Johanssen HHA does not know how much we will pay CCSD for services. We have not negotiated services, since we do not yet have a charter.
Dean Titterington has not seen the contract with Academica. He opened CCA 30 years ago when services like Academica were not around. We are utilizing Academica rather than finding each service individually and putting the financial health of our school at risk. We spoke to principals, managers, and board members at each school Academica manages and all the feedback was positive. Using Academica we believe is a very responsible use of tax payer dollars. Most charter schools fail because of poor financial management.
Lastly, that last quote is incorrect. I said that I think some people are uncomfortable with us using Academica because they are a company that does very well and makes money as a result.
Jen Gibbons
So you are not concerned about Academia’s shady dealings and Federal investigation at all?
Crickets….
We are posting many responses to questions we’ve received on our facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/Heritage-Heights-Academy-890547404330056/timeline/
Visit and post your questions!
According to the Service Agreement with Academica “back-office support” includes: record keeping, bookkeeping, staff administration, financial projections and financial statements, designated contact person, grant solicitation, financing solicitation and coordination, other funding sources, annual reporting, student assessment, school board representation, governmental compliance, charter renewal coordination, curriculum development, facilities identification expansion, design and development, systems development… essentially turning over the much of the operation of the charter to Academica
I am concerned about this new charter, especially the financial side. The Cherry Creek School Board has already said Cherry Creek is already under funded by the state to the tune of $224 million since the state chose to over ride the voters in Amendment 23. Transferring funds to start a new school will negatively impact already strained school budgets. Besides, Cherry Creek School are doing great! We already have outstanding outcomes. This school system works great for ALL kids already. I am convinced this is the wrong time for another charter.
I am concerned about this charter school. Cherry Creek Academy has been successful and is a wonderful option for students. As it was stated, there are no outside companies running Cherry Creek Academy and the purpose and mission has been maintained for the many years it has been opened. The people at Cherry Creek Academy are involved and invested in the school and there are no outside influences making money off of it. A question that isn’t answered is: How are the needs of the students who would attend Heritage Heights Academy not being met by a community based, neighborhood, public school? I would be interested to hear the interactions that occurred with the neighborhood schools and expressing the needs of the students before this application was made. There are 42 elementary schools in the Cherry Creek School district and with school of choice being an option, why would not one of those 42 schools that are already running meet the needs of the students?
Unfortunately, school of choice is not really an option for the majority. We are zoned for a low performing elementary school and were denied school of choice and intradistrict transfer. We’ve been told that it’s only really an option if you’re an employee of the district. I’m not sure if this charter is the perfect answer for us but it sure beats our alternative within the district.
“Academica, which operates more than 100 charter schools, primarily in Florida but also in Utah, California and other states, has been criticized in recent years for its business dealings. According to a Miami Herald investigation in 2011, the for-profit company pulled in more than $158 million in annual revenue. ”
Yes, we should be utilizing charter school companies that are NOT successful at what they do.