AURORA | The Aurora City Council is slated to vote at its Monday meeting on an agreement governing how local police respond to emergencies at the city’s federal immigration detention facility.
The vote was delayed earlier this month over concerns about public safety, immigration enforcement and community trust of police.
The proposed memorandum of understanding, or MOU, between the Aurora Police Department and the privately operated ICE detention center, run by Florida-based GEO Group, would clarify when and how officers respond to incidents ranging from detainee escapes to sexual assault allegations at the facility.
The GEO ICE facility has been the center of controversy and allegations of mistreatment of prisoners for years. Scrutiny by members of Congress and local activists has accelerated since the re-election of President Donald Trump and his mass-deportation policies.
At the April 6 meeting, city lawmakers voted 10-1 to postpone the measure for at least two weeks, citing the need for more public input and possible policy changes. Councilmember Stephanie Hancock was the lone vote against postponing the measure.
The updated agreement stems from a 2025 incident in which two detainees escaped the Aurora ICE Processing Center during a power outage, sparking a public dispute between federal officials and local police.
At the time, officials with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement blamed Aurora police for failing to respond quickly to the escape of two detainees. Aurora police leaders pushed back, saying they were not notified until hours after the escape and therefore the report did not meet the criteria for an urgent response under the existing agreement.
The updated agreement would outline local police’s options for responding to the facility and would allow police supervisors to assess the level of risk rather than relying on rigid definitions like “hot” or “cold” escapes.
Police officials have said the revised agreement is intended to eliminate confusion.
Under the proposed MOU, Aurora police would respond to criminal incidents at the detention center similarly to how they respond anywhere else in the city, but with explicit guardrails to ensure officers are not engaging in federal immigration enforcement, police and city legal officials said.
Public speakers at the April 6 meeting criticized the agreement for deepening ties between the police and federal immigration agents. They called out the use of local resources, including drones, canine units and patrol officers to respond to incidents at the facility, saying that many detainees are held on civil immigration violations, not criminal charges.
Others brought up numerous recent reports of poor conditions inside the detention center, including allegations of inadequate medical care, food and limited oversight.
Some activists questioned whether the agreement would erode trust between immigrant communities and local police.
Police have stressed that the agreement explicitly prohibits officers from enforcing civil immigration law.