
AURORA | The two Democratic Arapahoe County commissioners representing Districts 2 and 4, Jessica Campbell and Leslie Summey, face primary challenges this June from Angela Garland and Maya Wheeler, respectively.
Campbell, the incumbent District 2 commissioner elected in 2023, has a background as an attorney and is the founder of a Democratic consulting firm.
Garland is the development director for the nonprofit Scouting Colorado and has served on the Cherry Creek School District Board of Education since 2020.
Summey, the incumbent District 4 commissioner elected in 2022, is a U.S. Navy veteran and former small business owner.
Wheeler is the founder of the Wezesha Dada Center, which provides education and career resources, and has a background in healthcare.
Whoever is elected as the Democratic candidate for commissioner District 2 will face Republican challenger Carl Schuldies in November, while the Democratic candidate for commissioner District 4 will face Republican challenger Sunny Banka.
At a Democratic candidate forum in May, all four commissioner candidates made the case to voters why they should be the district’s next representative and spoke about their policy priorities.
One area of contention focused on the county’s oil and gas regulations. Campbell and Summey touted the restrictions they helped put in place as some of the strongest in the state, but said the county is limited by state law.
“Unfortunately, we don’t make the decision as to whether or not companies can engage,” Summey said. “I’m looking at some things that would allow us to separate land and mineral rights, so that we can move some things differently.”
Campbell added that she is working at the state level to expand the ways counties can restrict oil and gas projects.
“We need to work with our legislators to give us broader decision making ability for cumulative impact and other discretion,” she said.
Both Garland and Wheeler criticized the incumbents for not doing more to engage concerned residents and communicate what can and has been done, as well as what can’t be done, to regulate oil and gas.
“The community is not happy and they’re not saying Arapahoe County is doing a good job, they’re saying they’re not listening and they don’t care about them,” Wheeler said.
Campbell and Summey pushed back on that, saying they work extensively with the Save the Aurora Reservoir community group to craft regulations and educate the community.
“A lot of the success we’ve had in our first term has been because we work hand-in-hand with the community to solve problems,” Campbell said.
The theme of better communications and marketing of services came back up when the candidates discussed senior services.
Wheeler said the county needs to do a better job informing residents about the services that exist, including the Community Resource Department’s initiatives supporting seniors and the accessory dwelling unit program. She added that more housing options, like shared housing programs, which pairs seniors needing assistance with renters needing housing.
In response, the incumbent commissioners pointed to the county’s recent investments in services, which they were able to expand because of the 2024 voter-approved ballot measure to exempt the county from revenue caps imposed by the Taxpayers Bill of Rights, known as de-Brucing.
Summey and Campbell were supporters of the de-Brucing measure and continuously mentioned the ways it has improved county services, such as by allowing the county to put $1 million into the Aid to Agencies program, which funds local nonprofits.
“Because we de-Bruced, we are not furloughing or laying off employees like everybody else has,” Campbell said. “It is not the end-all be-all, you are correct, but it has saved this county and allowed us to continue to provide services.”
Summey also highlighted county policies she supported that help seniors be able to age in place, such as allowing construction of accessory dwelling units.
Garland said that while accessory dwelling units can be part of the solution for aging seniors, she also wants to see more options and consideration for them in the development process.
With both commissioner districts having a Republican challenger in the general election, candidates were split on whether they would endorse each other.
Summey said she would not support Wheeler in November, while Wheeler said she would support Summey as a fellow Democrat, but she emphasized that she is running because “people don’t feel heard or seen.”
Campbell said her endorsement would depend on whether Garland asked for it. Garland said she would consider it, saying “it would be a conversation.”
Ultimately, Campbell said she is running for re-election to continue her work so far.
“I have proven that I’m a problem solver and a devoted person to every single community member,” Campbell said.
Garland said she is working toward an Arapahoe County “for all ages and all stages” with goals of tackling affordability issues and supporting education.
“A lot of my work at the school district translates to the community because we’re dealing with families, mental health services and all sorts of things across our students,” Garland said.
Wheeler said she is running because she feels not enough has been done to address affordability and make people feel heard.
“I believe people are looking for accessible leadership, practical solutions, responsible planning and leaders who will listen and stay connected to the community,” Wheeler said.
Summey said she is dedicated to listening to her community and working to improve it.
“Every day I’m working for every last one of my constituents,” Summey said. “I often hear, ‘Thank you for returning my call, politicians usually don’t,’ but that’s my job.”
Arapahoe County District 4 Primary Candidates for 2026

Meet Leslie Summey
Leslie Summey, an U.S. Navy veteran and mother of five, is the incumbent District 4 commissioner, having been elected to the seat in 2022. She currently serves as board chair.

Summey has a background as a small business owner and she previously served as a legislative aide for Colorado House District 6 and on the Arapahoe County Subcommittee on Racial Equity in Criminal Justice.
Summey’s campaign highlights her work on criminal justice and public safety issues, including organizing warrant-clearing events aimed at helping individuals resolve low-level, nonviolent offenses without arrest. She also touts her efforts to dedicate funding to affordable housing and veterans’ services, as well as to create a five-year public health plan.
Whoever is elected as the Democratic candidate for commissioner District 4 will face Republican challenger Sunny Banka in November.
Website link: https://www.leslie4arapahoe.com
Meet Maya Wheeler
Maya Wheeler, an Aurora resident, is the founder of the Wezesha Dada Center, a nonprofit focused on economic opportunity, community support, and helping entrepreneurs and small businesses thrive. She has a background in healthcare administration and community advocacy.

Wheeler’s background includes work with the Colorado Health Benefit Exchange and Aurora Health Alliance, where she has advocated for expanding access to affordable healthcare. Wheeler has also served as chairperson of the Aurora Human Relations Commission and has held leadership roles with the African American Initiative of the Colorado Democratic Party, the Colorado Black Leadership Coalition and the Good Shepherd Organization. She previously served as executive director of the African Chamber of Commerce and formerly volunteered for CASA.
Wheeler’s campaign has emphasized local issues she says residents consistently raise, including affordability, infrastructure and environmental concerns. Some priorities she outlined are affordable housing, reliable public safety, infrastructure improvements to keep pace with growth and support for seniors seeking to remain in their communities.
Whoever is elected as the Democratic candidate for commissioner District 4 will face Republican challenger Sunny Banka in November.
Website link: www.maya4arapahoe.com
Q&A with Leslie Summey
Q: Aurora elected officials regularly complain that its three counties are the statutory recipients of funds for public health, elderly care and many other social programs, yet Aurora city taxpayers must also pay for those services. Is Aurora getting its fair share?
A: We don’t just serve 100,000 residents in unincorporated Arapahoe County. We serve all 655,000+ residents of the county regardless of which city or municipality they’re in. The county receives funding from the state and federal government. Counties provide services that cities and municipalities don’t. Arapahoe County has made significant investments to advance affordable housing in Aurora among other projects. By partnering with the city, we’re able to make our collective taxpayer dollars go further to serve our residents.
Q: Aurora is aging along with the rest of the state and the nation, with the median age of Adams, Arapahoe and Douglas county residents climbing from 35.7 years to 37.1 years between 2012 and 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. What more could the county do or what could it do better to serve older residents?
A: Fortunately, the aging of the area isn’t a surprise to the county. Our elected offices and administrative staff heard from the State Demographer recently about this trend, and what we need to know in Arapahoe to serve our residents effectively. Arapahoe County has been proactive in addressing the fact that our area is aging. For example, our Community Resources department houses services for our seniors from light housekeeping to transportation, to weatherization, to job training and reskilling under one umbrella. Seniors can visit one building, not several. Or they can call one number to get connected to resources, instead of having to call many different numbers. We are constantly looking at our systems through the lens of those who access services.
Q: What is the most important difference between you and your opponent in the primary, and how does it illustrate that you’re the better candidate?
A: The most important difference between me and my opponent is I know this job, and I’m effective. I’ve had a successful first term, so much so I’ve been entrusted by my fellow commissioners to serve as Chair for the past two years. I campaigned in 2022 on removing the revenue cap of TABOR for Arapahoe County. In 2024 we went to the ballot. Voters approved 1A to “de-bruce” the county with 71% of the vote–an example of “promises made–promises kept.” In my first two years, I spearheaded a first of its kind county parking ordinance. I am serious about doing the work for every resident of our District 4 family and all of Arapahoe County every day in a way that my constituents know I’m honest, effective, and strategic–all in service to them.
Q: Since the demise of Tri-County Health Department, all three counties have created their own health departments, and all three counties have seen marked decrease in health-department savings. Should the counties look at new ways to combine resources? Or was the separation a good thing for county residents?
A: Although the decision to end the Tri-County relationship was made before I was a commissioner, I was excited to be a part of standing up the inaugural Arapahoe County Board of Health! Arapahoe County was not in favor of the split, but we took the opportunity to be intentional about centering residents’ priorities, especially those in Aurora, and ensuring those priorities are reflected in the work the Health Department does. The County has been intentional about making strategic and smart investments without breaking the bank. And whenever possible we apply for and secure grant funding. Arapahoe County has taken a situation that was not ideal and created something that’s focused solely on Arapahoe County residents.
Q: How should the county support the 18th Judicial District in the event that the city of Aurora ends criminal prosecution at the municipal level?
A: Because of 1A the county was able to ensure we could address caseload increases and some right-sizing. We’ve been able to increase the budget of the 18th Judicial District by over 30%. We need to learn more because this conversation is happening throughout the state, given the state’s constitution. We need to look at what those impacts may be and determine what the appropriate resources are.
Q: Has the county done enough to ensure that residents affected by oil and gas projects near and beyond the Aurora Reservoir have had their concerns addressed as fracking and drilling projects move ahead?
A: The county cares about the health and welfare of our residents. The process of creating the strongest oil and gas regulations in the state took the county two years to do and included multiple public meetings both in the daytime and special evening meetings. There have been countless phone conversations and in-person conversations. Because of this stakeholder engagement and thousands of comments received over time, Arapahoe County has some of the furthest setbacks in Colorado, we have a new inspection program, and we continue to stand with our residents as we navigate a system with clear parameters around what the county can and cannot do.
Q: Above all, what one thing would you like to say was your legacy to time served on the county commission?
A: My hope when all is said and done, is that I’ve honored the unknown ancestor of mine who survived the Middle Passage so that I could live to be the very first African-American commissioner in Arapahoe County and the very first Chair of the Board. If I’ve honored that ancestor and helped my constituents to be able to live the life they love living here in Arapahoe County, then I have done my job.
Q: Outside of law enforcement, should the county take a more active role in youth violence prevention? If so, how?
A: Arapahoe County is taking an active role in youth violence prevention. I serve as the chair of the subcommittee of the Arapahoe County Justice Coordinating Committee that focuses on racial equity in the criminal justice system. Arapahoe County hosted a peer exchange focused on Justice Coordinating Committees. I’ve attended peer exchanges on justice and also on opioids. I have been focused on networking with cities and counties that have seen a marked decrease in youth violence and connecting those jurisdictions with folks here to work on the root causes and begin to change them. I’d like to implement the H.O.P.E. framework (Tufts University) throughout the county. Children need a particular set of positive experiences in their communities to grown into healthy resilient adults. If we can apply the framework throughout the county, we could create a shift in families that could help break generational cycles.
Q: Should Arapahoe County hire a chief administrator? Why or why not?
A: Arapahoe County is a little different from most in the state. We don’t have a county manager or county administrator. That said, the county is currently evaluating our systems and structure to see if it needs fine-tuning.
Q&A with Maya Wheeler
Q: Aurora elected officials regularly complain that its three counties are the statutory recipients of funds for public health, elderly care and many other social programs, yet Aurora city taxpayers must also pay for those services. Is Aurora getting its fair share?
A: Aurora’s concerns deserve to be taken seriously, but I do not know whether it is receiving its fair share because I have not seen the data needed to make that determination. Aurora’s location in three counties creates unique challenges, and residents deserve transparency about how public dollars are allocated and what services they receive in return. Counties are the statutory recipients of many public health and human-services funds, and those resources are generally distributed based on population, eligibility, legal requirements, and community need. As County Commissioner, my responsibility would be to ensure resources are allocated fairly and effectively for residents throughout Arapahoe County while making sure Aurora residents receive equitable access to county-funded services. If gaps exist, I would advocate for stronger coordination and fair allocation of resources so taxpayers receive the services they need and deserve.
Q: Aurora is aging along with the rest of the state and the nation, with the median age of Adams, Arapahoe and Douglas county residents climbing from 35.7 years to 37.1 years between 2012 and 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. What more could the county do or what could it do better to serve older residents?
A: Arapahoe County already provides valuable services for older adults, including transportation, chore assistance, caregiver support, benefits navigation, and protective services. As our population ages, we should continue strengthening these programs while exploring additional ways to help older adults remain independent and safely age in place. One opportunity worth exploring is voluntary home-sharing and intergenerational housing programs. Many older adults are house rich but cash poor. They may own a home but struggle with rising costs, home maintenance, transportation, and social isolation. While accessory dwelling units (ADUs) can help some homeowners, they are often expensive to build and can be difficult to navigate due to permitting and financing requirements. Home-sharing programs may provide a lower-cost alternative by matching older adults with compatible tenants, caregivers, students, or workers who can provide companionship and assistance with tasks such as snow removal, lawn care, transportation, and household chores. By building on existing services and exploring innovative aging-in-place solutions, Arapahoe County can help older adults remain independent, connected to their communities, and in their homes for as long as possible.
Q: What is the most important difference between you and your opponent in the primary, and how does it illustrate that you’re the better candidate?
A: The most important difference in this race is that I have spent my career working directly with the people the county government serves. While many elected officials build their experience within government, I have spent more than 15 years working alongside families, seniors, youth, small businesses, and community organizations to solve problems and connect people with resources. As a Child Welfare Specialist and founder of the Wezesha Dada Center (WDC), I have built my career around listening to people, understanding their challenges, and helping them navigate complex systems. I also hold master’s degrees in Business Administration, Health Administration, and Information Management, giving me the practical and professional experience needed to address county issues. Recent county survey results found that many residents are unsure about the county’s direction, have limited familiarity with county services, and that trust in county government is lower among District 4 residents than in other parts of the county. I believe those findings show residents want a county government that is more accessible, responsive, and connected to the community. That experience makes me the better candidate because I bring the qualifications and community-based perspective needed to rebuild trust, improve communication, and ensure residents feel heard, represented, and respected.
Q: Since the demise of Tri-County Health Department, all three counties have created their own health departments, and all three counties have seen marked decrease in health-department savings. Should the counties look at new ways to combine resources? Or was the separation a good thing for county residents?
A: I do not believe we have enough long-term data yet to definitively determine whether the dissolution of Tri-County Health Department has been a success or a setback. The counties have only been operating independent health departments for a few years, and it will take time to fully evaluate costs, service delivery, public health outcomes, and long-term sustainability. That said, I believe counties should always look for opportunities to share resources and collaborate when doing so improves services and reduces costs. Public health challenges do not stop at county boundaries, and there may be opportunities to coordinate purchasing, pursue joint grants, share specialized expertise, or collaborate on emergency preparedness while still maintaining local control. The question should not be whether we return to the previous model. The question should be whether residents are receiving high-quality services and taxpayers are receiving good value. As County Commissioner, I would support data-driven evaluations and regional partnerships where they improve outcomes, reduce duplication, and make the best use of public resources.
Q: How should the county support the 18th Judicial District in the event that the city of Aurora ends criminal prosecution at the municipal level?
A: If Aurora ends criminal prosecution at the municipal level, the county should work closely with the 18th Judicial District to ensure it has the staffing, courtroom capacity, victim services, and other resources needed to handle any increase in cases effectively. The county has already experienced the impact of Aurora transferring domestic violence prosecutions to the district court system. That experience showed the importance of planning ahead and ensuring the courts have the resources necessary to avoid delays and maintain public confidence in the justice system. My priority would be protecting public safety, supporting victims, ensuring due process, and being a responsible steward of taxpayer dollars. Any transition should be carefully planned, data-driven, and coordinated among the courts, the District Attorney’s Office, law enforcement, Aurora, and county leaders. Residents deserve a justice system that is fair, efficient, and responsive, regardless of which level of government is handling a case.
Q: Has the county done enough to ensure that residents affected by oil and gas projects near and beyond the Aurora Reservoir have had their concerns addressed as fracking and drilling projects move ahead?
A: Arapahoe County has adopted significant regulations and mitigation measures related to oil and gas development. However, I do not believe all residents affected by projects near and beyond the Aurora Reservoir feel their concerns have been adequately addressed. Many residents continue to raise concerns about air quality, water quality, noise, bright lighting from drilling operations, traffic, public health, and overall quality of life. The fact that these concerns continue to be raised suggests more engagement, transparency, and communication are needed. I recognize that the county has limited authority over oil and gas permitting, as much of that authority rests with the state. However, the county still has a responsibility to advocate for residents, address surface impacts, and ensure community concerns are heard and considered throughout the process. As County Commissioner, I would support science-based decision-making, strong oversight, and ongoing community engagement to help protect public health, water resources, and quality of life.
Q: Above all, what one thing would you like to say was your legacy to time served on the county commission?
A: Above all, I would like my legacy to be that I helped build a county government that residents trusted, felt connected to, and could rely on. Too many people feel disconnected from local government and unsure whether their concerns matter. I want residents to know they have a commissioner who listens, responds, and shows up. Whether someone is concerned about public safety, housing, roads, small business development, public health, or quality of life, they deserve to be heard and treated with respect. If I am fortunate enough to serve, I hope people will say that I was accessible, responsive, and focused on putting residents first. I want to be known as a commissioner who worked hard, communicated openly, and strengthened the connection between county government and the communities it serves. If, at the end of my service, residents can say they trusted their county government more because they felt heard, represented, and respected, I would consider that my greatest accomplishment.
Q: Outside of law enforcement, should the county take a more active role in youth violence prevention? If so, how?
A: Yes. While law enforcement plays an important role in public safety, youth violence prevention requires addressing the root causes of violence before it occurs. The county should take a more active role by investing in prevention, family support, mentorship, behavioral health services, and pathways to education and employment. I support existing diversion, restorative justice, and behavioral health efforts and believe we should continue expanding them. My perspective comes from working with families, youth, and communities through mentoring, public health, community programs, and service as a CASA. I have seen how trauma, isolation, and lack of opportunity can contribute to conflict and violence. We should help young people build resiliency, confidence, communication, and conflict-resolution skills while strengthening positive community connections. We should also support parents and caregivers through behavioral health services and early intervention resources. I would support partnerships with schools, nonprofits, labor unions, apprenticeship programs, employers, and community organizations to expand mentorship, workforce training, career exploration, summer jobs, and behavioral health services. Through WDC’s youth programs, I have seen how helping young people feel heard, valued, connected, and capable of succeeding can change lives. If we want safer communities, we must invest in youth and families before a crisis occurs.
Q: Should Arapahoe County hire a chief administrator? Why or why not?
A: Not at this time. Before creating a new executive position, I would want evidence that a Chief Administrator would improve efficiency, accountability, and service to residents. While some counties use this model, there is no clear evidence that it produces better results than Arapahoe County’s current structure. Taxpayers deserve to know the costs, expected benefits, and how the position would improve county operations before any decision is made. My focus is on ensuring county government is responsive, transparent, fiscally responsible, and delivers results for residents. Until there is a demonstrated need, I believe we should focus on making the current system work as effectively as possible.
The lighter side of Leslie Summey
Q: LIGHTER SIDE: What food do you hate most?
A: Merguez. Thirty plus years later I can still taste it and…no.
Q: LIGHTER SIDE: Are you a dog person? A cat person? No pets?
A: Yes. Love cats but I’m allergic. We have dogs.
Q: LIGHTER SIDE: What book did you read last? Be honest!
A: “Separation of Church and Hate–A Sane Person’s Guide to Taking Back the Bible from Fundamentalists, Fascists, and Flock-Fleecing Frauds” by John Fugelsang
The lighter side of Maya Wheeler
Q: LIGHTER SIDE: What food do you hate most?
A: Liver. I’ve tried to like it, but we’re just not meant to be friends.
Q: LIGHTER SIDE: Are you a dog person? A cat person? No pets?
A: I like both, but my cat Walter may have converted me. I never thought I’d own a cat, but he’s been full of surprises and keeps life interesting.
Q: LIGHTER SIDE: What book did you read last? Be honest!
A: To be honest, I haven’t finished a book recently. Most of my reading these days is reports, contracts, and grant applications. Somewhere along the way, my idea of a page-turner became a budget spreadsheet.
Arapahoe County District 2 Primary Candidates for 2026

Meet Jessica Campbell

Jessica Campbell is the incumbent District 2 commissioner, having been elected in 2023. Campbell’s background is as an attorney, small business owner, teacher and community advocate. She founded Brighter Day Strategies, a consulting firm supporting progressive campaigns in Colorado, and previously worked for Colorado Sen. Iman Jodeh.
Campbell’s website touts her work on comprehensive housing and land use reforms, passing more protective oil and gas regulations, resolving the county’s budget crisis and reducing negative impacts from Centennial Airport. Some of her goals for a second term are easing east-west traffic issues, strengthening economic development efforts, improving county communications and examining reforms to reduce poverty and crime.
Whoever is elected as the Democratic candidate for commissioner District 2 will face Republican challenger Carl Schuldies in November.
Meet Angela Garland

Angela Garland, a working mom and the development director for the nonprofit Scouting Colorado, is a community advocate and has served on the Cherry Creek School District Board of Education since 2020. Garland also serves on the board for the Community College of Aurora Foundation and has worked with Friends First, Great Education Colorado and Girls Inc.
A focus area of Garland’s campaign is the impact of growth in the county and some of her goals in addressing growth include safer streets, adding attainable housing, supporting small businesses and ensuring services are easy to navigate. Other priorities listed on Garland’s website are preserving open space, expanding healthcare access, addressing homelessness and improving public safety and social services.
Whoever is elected as the Democratic candidate for commissioner District 2 will face Republican challenger Carl Schuldies in November.
Q&A with Jessica Campbell
Q: Aurora elected officials regularly complain that its three counties are the statutory recipients of funds for public health, elderly care and many other social programs, yet Aurora city taxpayers must also pay for those services. Is Aurora getting its fair share?
I believe we are doing our best to meet the needs of our Aurora residents. I always take the needs of Aurora residents into consideration.
The funds we get from the federal and state governments almost never cover 100% of services we provide. There is almost always a county match of some percentage. So, across the County, taxpayers are paying for those services. It is also a fairly standard practice for local governments to create specific programs or supplement services when there are particular issues in their jurisdiction.
Specifically, our Human Services building is in Aurora, we have a public health office in north Aurora, which also houses judicial services and veteran services, our weatherization building is in Aurora and more. We have given millions to the navigation campus and Aurora Mental Health and Recovery. Earlier this year, we approved funding for an affordable housing project in Aurora which will create over 200 units. A bulk of our most vulnerable residents live in Aurora, and we are targeting more and more dollars to support the elderly, youth, those experiencing homelessness, and those in poverty.
There is always room for improvement, and I’m always open for conversation.
Q: Aurora is aging along with the rest of the state and the nation, with the median age of Adams, Arapahoe and Douglas county residents climbing from 35.7 years to 37.1 years between 2012 and 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. What more could the county do or what could it do better to serve older residents?
Supporting our aging population is a priority for the County. From targeting housing projects for Seniors, to our Senior Services program in Community Resources, to Human Services’ elder abuse services, our Public Health department working on elder health, and our Aid to Agencies fund, which lists “older adults” as a priority population – we are targeting support to our older populations.
We need to continue to lean in on housing options for our older population. Property tax increases impact those on a fixed income most dramatically. We do not have the stock for our seniors to downsize into something more affordable. I’m proud of the work I’ve done in my first term toward that end and hope to have another term to keep moving that work forward. In a second term, I want to improve access to public and micro transit. While we’ve been increasing density, which allows for more walkability for our seniors – it doesn’t solve access and transportation issues for everyone. Third – our senior services program does not have the resources to meet the needs of our seniors. I am actively working with our Director of Community Resources on solutions and will continue that work in a second term.
Q: What is the most important difference between you and your opponent in the primary, and how does it illustrate that you’re the better candidate?
Our records.
We both sit on Boards. We are but one vote. But one person can bring their board along if they have the will. The boards we sit on are responsible for outcomes, for budget sustainability, and for staff/leadership oversight.
In the three and a half years at the County, I have led on securing a $125 million commitment to improving our roads and bridges, establishing the strictest oil and gas regulations in the state, creating a permanent affordable housing fund, creating a permanent eviction prevention program with wrap-around services. creating our first countywide strategic plan and the alignment of our budget with that plan. These efforts are producing results. One example: unhoused homelessness is down 35% in Arapahoe with no families sleeping on the street.
My opponent has been on the Cherry Creek School Board for six years, including serving as its President from 2023-2025. One need only google “What’s going on with Cherry Creek School District” to see the litany of issues from fairly dramatic HR issues, a huge budget shortfall amidst questionable spending and flawed financial processes, to the firing of 159 staff that have occurred during my opponent’s time on the Board.
Q: Since the demise of Tri-County Health Department, all three counties have created their own health departments, and all three counties have seen marked decrease in health-department savings. Should the counties look at new ways to combine resources? Or was the separation a good thing for county residents?
While we lost some economies of scale – I believe the separation was a good thing. The Arapahoe County Public Health Department can focus on the needs of OUR residents. We completed our Community Health Assessment and Community Health Improvement Plan that guides the Department’s work from 2025-2030. For the first time – that plan is informed by Arapahoe residents’ needs ONLY. And as we’ve been scaling up since 2023, our Department has been incredibly successful.
What has been more damaging to the budget have been cuts to public health funding at the federal level and the budget crunch at the state level. The Board has been able to close the gap on some of that lost funding, but not completely.
I am always up for partnering with our neighboring counties on shared programs. There is a lot of overlap in the needs of our populations though they are unique overall. Where there is opportunity for sharing resources, I am always open to exploring that.
Q: How should the county support the 18th Judicial District in the event that the city of Aurora ends criminal prosecution at the municipal level?
I will be surprised if this happens as wholesale as it was initially stated if at all. As I recall, this was an agenda item for a working session but it’s been removed, and I believe it has not been placed back on an agenda.
Aurora does have a choice though. They can either rework their criminal code and examine sentencing for misdemeanors or push the cases to the County.
If they choose option B, it would be hugely detrimental. The County and JD18 have already been absorbing Aurora’s domestic violence cases after Aurora made the decision to stop prosecuting DV. The County’s budget would struggle to absorb the increase of misdemeanor cases.
I hope Aurora chooses option A.
DA Padden has been proactive in having conversations with city council members. And should Aurora choose to push cases to us – just as we did in 2024-2025 when we were absorbing the DV cases, the BOCC will be active in conversations. My hope would be that we have an intergovernmental agreement about a transition for cases and ideally – some years of financial support from the City for FTE to absorb those cases until the County budget can absorb them.
Q: Has the county done enough to ensure that residents affected by oil and gas projects near and beyond the Aurora Reservoir have had their concerns addressed as fracking and drilling projects move ahead?
First, I want to recognize the incredible pain and anguish these oil and gas operations are creating for our community. I have sat and cried with residents on more than one occasion and share their grief.
Second, I’m proud to have worked hand-in-hand with community to draft and pass the strictest oil and gas regulations in the state. We have the farthest setbacks, 24/7 air and water quality monitoring requirements, an in-house inspections program, county financial assurances stricter than the state, and increased penalties for violations. We have done what we can within the authority given to us from the state.
Third, I would like more of these applications to go to a hearing before the Board. This is something our residents have consistently asked for. Generally, we could do a better job communicating as well. That is something we work with staff on regularly and I will continue to work on.
Ultimately – counties need more authority from the state legislature to deny applications. Should the state grant us more discretion based on impacts to the environment, cumulative impact, and community input as we have with most land use decisions – we would be able to make different decisions.
Q: Above all, what one thing would you like to say was your legacy to time served on the county commission?
That I got stuff done – solved problems, benefitted our residents, and made a healthy, thriving, and sustainable Arapahoe County.
Residents are right to expect government to work for them. That is the social contract. It doesn’t happen enough and I fault NO ONE for losing faith in government.
Government CAN work for its residents. It can be effective, responsive, provide services at a high level, and create the context within which people can thrive. I believe we’re doing that in Arapahoe and I want to keep doing that work.
In a second term, I will take my demonstrated problem-solving skills and apply them to tackling our traffic woes. I’ve already started, but I need more time to make a more dramatic impact. I want to expand our housing initiatives from rental support into ownership support. I want to continue our efforts in economic development – from bringing in awesome primary employers to supporting entrepreneurship, retraining, and apprenticeships. And I want to be there to ensure the many first-time programs I led on are carried out based on their original mission. Those programs are not statues you stand up and walk away from – they are gardens that must be tended to.
Q: Outside of law enforcement, should the county take a more active role in youth violence prevention? If so, how?
I’m proud to say the County is already engaged in this work though it may not always seem obvious.
We understand the core drivers of youth violence through understanding social determinants of health. Key drivers are: a lack of economic stability, a built environment and community that does not offer respite from exposure to & a normalization of community violence, structural racism, community trauma, and a lack of access to mental health resources. (Access to education is also relevant – education is the one thing counties don’t do.)
Almost every outward-facing department in Arapahoe County has something to do with this issue. And if you look at our strategic plan – you will see in our focus areas – we are working on the above issues. Our focus areas are: Safe and Healthy Communities, Economic Resilience and Stability, Sustainable Growth and Infrastructure, Workforce and Community Prosperity. Our plan instructs our departments’ priorities and direction. We are targeting resources to our youth in our housing programs, our aid to agencies program, our workforce development programs, public health, and as always – human services.
That said – I am always open to suggestions. And we could do better with partnerships and collaboration with our schools and non-profits.
Q: Should Arapahoe County hire a chief administrator? Why or why not?
Not at this time. I am always open to conversations about how to make government more effective. We must ask ourselves what makes something effective and what the tradeoffs are. Arapahoe County is unique in not having a County Manager thus it makes sense for this question to come up. I have yet to be presented with a convincing argument that shows our structure is failing or less effective than other structures. The Board is the Manager. I see this as a positive. Two members (I am one of them) sit on our Executive Budget Committee. We liaise directly with our department directors. We have our hands on more decisions and issues and at a deeper level than other commissioners. This gives our residents a Board that has more control and is more accountable. This is a more direct form of representation and democracy.
Q&A with Angela Garland
Q: Aurora elected officials regularly complain that its three counties are the statutory recipients of funds for public health, elderly care and many other social programs, yet Aurora city taxpayers must also pay for those services. Is Aurora getting its fair share?
A: I understand the concerns Aurora residents and officials have raised about how tax dollars and public services are distributed. Aurora residents contribute significantly to the county tax base, and many understandably ask whether they are getting a fair return. It’s important to recognize that counties and municipalities serve different roles under Colorado law. Arapahoe County is the statutory provider of critical services like public health, human services, senior programs, child welfare, and workforce assistance services that benefit all residents, including those in Aurora. City taxpayers may not see these as directly as municipal programs like police, roads, or parks, but they rely on them every day. Aurora’s position spanning three counties can create real challenges in coordination and perceptions of inequity. As Commissioner, I will work to ensure county resources are allocated based on need, population, and legal requirements, so Aurora residents continue to see substantial returns from county-funded programs and services. Rather than treating this as a competition between governments, I’ll focus on strengthening partnerships that maximize taxpayer value and improve outcomes for everyone in Aurora and Arapahoe County.
Q: Aurora is aging along with the rest of the state and the nation, with the median age of Adams, Arapahoe and Douglas county residents climbing from 35.7 years to 37.1 years between 2012 and 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. What more could the county do or what could it do better to serve older residents?
A: Our seniors are a treasure. Growing up, my family’s elders helped raise me, and that shaped how I see our responsibility to one another. One of our most important obligations is ensuring older residents can age with dignity, independence, and access to the services they need. As Arapahoe County grows older, we must keep adapting our programs to meet their changing needs. First, I will strengthen transportation options for seniors who no longer drive. Reliable, affordable transportation is essential for reaching medical appointments, grocery stores, and social activities. Expanding mobility services and transit partnerships reduces isolation and improves quality of life. Second, I will invest in affordable, accessible housing and work with other governing bodies to help elder homeowners age in the paid-off homes and communities they love. Third, I will improve access to health and behavioral health services through stronger outreach, connecting seniors to county programs for caregiving, nutrition, financial assistance, and mental health support that many don’t know exist. Finally, I will foster social connection across generations through senior centers, volunteer opportunities, and community programs that combat loneliness. By prioritizing these efforts, I will make Arapahoe County a place where residents thrive at every stage of life.
Q: What is the most important difference between you and your opponent in the primary, and how does it illustrate that you’re the better candidate?
A: The most important difference is that I’m a hands-on problem-solver with a track record of actually making systems work for people, not just naming priorities and hoping they get solved. My whole career has been about rolling up my sleeves and delivering under real constraints. As a Cherry Creek School Board Director and nonprofit manager, I forged internet access solutions so students could keep learning during the pandemic, secured healthcare protections for teachers by getting them recognized as frontline workers, and brought schools, businesses, and community leaders together to serve families across the county. That’s not theory. Those are problems I found, dug into, and solved. That’s the contrast voters should weigh. County government isn’t about speeches, it’s about making daily life work better: attainable housing, safer neighborhoods, reliable transportation, and disciplined budgeting in one of Colorado’s fastest-growing counties. I’ve spent years stretching limited resources and being accountable for the results at the ballot box. I lead with integrity, listen first, and focus on outcomes over politics, and that’s exactly the kind of practical, hands-on leadership Arapahoe County needs as it grows.
Q: Since the demise of Tri-County Health Department, all three counties have created their own health departments, and all three counties have seen marked decrease in health-department savings. Should the counties look at new ways to combine resources? Or was the separation a good thing for county residents?
A: The dissolution of the Tri-County Health Department and the creation of separate county health departments brought both benefits and challenges. The transition gave Arapahoe County greater local control over public health priorities, letting us tailor programs to the unique needs of our residents, including those in Aurora and our unincorporated communities. Local decision-making can improve responsiveness and accountability. But operating three independent health departments has also reduced some of the economies of scale that existed under the regional model. Administrative costs, staffing, technology systems, and specialized public health functions all become more expensive when duplicated across multiple agencies. At a time when local governments must be responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars, we should stay open to collaboration. Science and facts matter. When elected by District 2 voters, I will explore returning to the previous structure and promote smart regional partnerships. The counties could share resources in areas like laboratory services, emergency preparedness, disease surveillance, and data management while maintaining local control over policy and community programs.
Q: How should the county support the 18th Judicial District in the event that the city of Aurora ends criminal prosecution at the municipal level?
A: As an Arapahoe County Commissioner, my priority would be maintaining public safety, due process, and efficient court operations if Aurora were to end criminal prosecution at the municipal level. Such a change could significantly increase the caseload for the 18th Judicial District, the District Attorney’s Office, public defenders, and county justice services. It could also affect access and raise equity concerns. I would begin immediately by working closely with Aurora, the state judiciary, law enforcement, and the District Attorney to assess the projected impact on case volume, staffing, courtroom capacity, and detention services, then build a solution that serves Aurora residents. Any transition must be carefully planned to avoid delays that undermine public confidence in the justice system. If additional resources are needed, I will advocate for state funding and explore cost-sharing agreements with Aurora, since municipal decisions should not become an unfunded mandate for county taxpayers. At the same time, we should expand diversion programs, behavioral health services, and restorative justice initiatives for eligible offenders. These approaches reduce recidivism and let courts focus on serious offenses. The goal is a smooth transition that protects safety while keeping the system accessible and fiscally responsible.
Q: Has the county done enough to ensure that residents affected by oil and gas projects near and beyond the Aurora Reservoir have had their concerns addressed as fracking and drilling projects move ahead?
A: No, I do not believe Arapahoe County has done enough to ensure that residents affected by oil and gas development near the Aurora Reservoir feel their concerns have been heard and addressed. The county has participated in the regulatory process and worked with state agencies and operators, but too many residents remain frustrated about communication, transparency, and their ability to meaningfully influence decisions affecting their communities. Many key decisions about oil and gas development are governed by state law and regulated by state agencies. That does not relieve county government of its responsibility to advocate for residents and provide clear, timely information about proposed projects, their potential impacts, and opportunities for public input. As Commissioner, I would support a more proactive, inclusive approach: holding additional public meetings, strengthening notification requirements, creating a centralized online portal for project information, and providing regular updates on drilling activity, environmental monitoring, and enforcement. Residents should not have to dig through multiple agencies and technical documents to understand what is happening in their neighborhoods. I will work more closely with state regulators, local governments, business stakeholders, and community organizations to ensure concerns about air quality, water, traffic, noise, and public health are fully considered throughout permitting. Even when the county cannot stop a project, it can be a stronger advocate and a fair mediator among stakeholders. My goal is to build trust through transparency, communication, and accountability. Residents deserve to know their voices matter and their concerns are taken seriously.
Q: Above all, what one thing would you like to say was your legacy to time served on the county commission?
A: That when I left, people in Arapahoe County trusted their county government again, because it actually listened to them and delivered. If I’m remembered for one thing, I’d want it to be that I helped make this a place where working families can afford to put down roots and stay, where you can find a home you can afford, get around without sitting in traffic for an hour, and know that when you bring a concern to your commissioners, someone is actually listening and acting on it. Not big speeches or grand projects with my name on them. Just the quiet, steady work of making everyday life work better, and proving that local government can still be honest, responsive, and on your side.
Q: Outside of law enforcement, should the county take a more active role in youth violence prevention? If so, how?
A: Yes. While law enforcement plays an important role in public safety, youth violence prevention must begin long before a young person enters the justice system. Arapahoe County should take a more active role in creating opportunities that help young people stay connected, engaged, and invested in their futures. Having served several years on the Cherry Creek School District Board of Directors, I have seen firsthand how a strong education, paired with quality extracurricular and after-school programs, helps young people make positive choices. When students are engaged in academics, arts, athletics, and clubs, they build the skills, relationships, and confidence to succeed. The county can support prevention by expanding partnerships with schools, libraries, parks, nonprofits, and local businesses. We should create more opportunities for youth to connect with older adults through mentoring and community service, intergenerational relationships that build belonging and responsibility. We should also keep investing in quality parks, trails, and open spaces for sports and recreation. Library programs, summer jobs, internships, and career exploration with county businesses can help youth envision a positive future. The best violence prevention strategy is creating pathways to opportunity, connection, and purpose for every young person long before a crisis ever begins.
Q: Should Arapahoe County hire a chief administrator? Why or why not?
A: I firmly believe in smart government, not an expanded one. Every decision should be guided by whether it improves services for residents, increases accountability, and makes the best use of taxpayer dollars. That is why I would carefully study the need for a county administrator before supporting or opposing the position. The central question is whether an administrator would duplicate existing functions or provide real value as a conduit for implementation, coordination, and continuity. Commissioners set policy and represent residents, but day-to-day management of a large, complex organization requires consistent operational leadership. A county administrator serves as the chief appointed executive responsible for implementing board policy, overseeing departments, managing budgets, coordinating long-term planning, and ensuring quality service delivery. A qualified administrator can also provide continuity through election cycles, keeping strategic priorities on track regardless of changes in elected leadership. That said, any new position must be justified. I would want a clear analysis of costs, responsibilities, reporting structures, and measurable benefits. If the role simply adds another layer of bureaucracy, I would oppose it. If it improves efficiency, strengthens accountability, and delivers better services, it deserves serious consideration. Smart government means evaluating every option based on results, not titles.
The lighter side of Jessica Campbell
Q: LIGHTER SIDE: What food do you hate most?
Kale. I know it’s nutritious – and I can handle it when it’s well-concealed in other foods. But man – the flavor when it’s on its own – I just can’t get down. I’ve tried, y’all – and just BLEGH.
Q: LIGHTER SIDE: Are you a dog person? A cat person? No pets?
Both! I am the proud mama to two gorgeous catters – Arthur and Luna – twin siamese toasty marshmallows. And I’m the loving auntie to many a pupper. As we say, “¿Por qué no los dos?”
Q: LIGHTER SIDE: What book did you read last? Be honest!
Haha – going to be exposed for the government nerd I am – Harvard Business Review compendium of essays: HBR Guide to Leading Through Change.
The lighter side of Angela Garland
Q: LIGHTER SIDE: What food do you hate most?
A: Cilantro. To me it tastes like soap, no matter how it is prepared, and I have made peace with the fact that I will never understand what everyone else is so excited about.
Q: LIGHTER SIDE: Are you a dog person? A cat person? No pets?
A: Dog Person
Q: LIGHTER SIDE: What book did you read last? Be honest!
A: Lessons in Chemistry by Bonnie Garmus
