Sign up for our free Sentinel email E-ditions to get the latest news directly in your inbox.
The Sentinel not only cares deeply about bringing our readers accurate and critical news, we insist all of the crucial stories we provide are available for everyone — for free.
Like you, we know how critical accurate and dependable information and facts are in making the best decisions about, well, everything that matters. Factual reporting is crucial to a sound democracy, a solid community and a satisfying life.
So there’s no paywall at SentinelColorado.com. Our print editions are free on stands across the region, and our daily email E-ditions are free just for signing up, to anyone.
But we need your help to carry out this essential mission.
Please help us keep the Sentinel different and still here when you need us, for everyone. Join us now, and thank you.
Editor: After viewing twenty years of bs from politicians after countless mass shootings in this country, I offer this nitty gritty comment:
IF the fifty Republican senators who refuse to bring up a vote on the House gun reform bill found themselves barricaded in an enclosed space with an armed perpetrator, faced with their own mortality, would it change their thinking about an archaic second amendment? or their hearts and minds? Is that power?
— Maggie Kuchta, via letters@sentinelcolorado.com
Comments are closed.
In 2012, following Sandy Creek, Congress said that it is okay to use a weapon of war to slaughter 6 year olds. The deaths of 40,00 Americans yearly and the maimings of twice that number have not changed their minds or hearts.
Remember in November. Look at candidates’ platforms, their voting record, and their contributors. Honor the dead with action.
This was edited to correct the name to Sandy HOOK, but the editing software failed.
No it would not! They would use their own firearms to end the threat! The 2nd amendment is for just that reason. We give it up and you will have nothing to defend yourself from the criminals as they don’t care what the laws are.
Subjects are disarmed, Free men own guns.
The answer to your question is “nothing.” Any change in policy would be seen as an admission of wrongdoing.
I thought they did on January 6th. And no, they did not stand up to them, or for the people or country they represent. And they will probably get re-elected.