Editor: I question the objectivity of the Supreme Court when one is married to a right-wing conspiracy theory advocate; when one has seven children; and when one was accused of sexual assault during a teen-age beer drinking spree.

Seems their fodder of law-speak works contradict common sense actions.

Moreover, why should Mitch McConnell have such a heavy hand in selecting these justices?

As stated in the Constitution, by the Founding Fathers, no elected official should be a lifelong politician.

The Kentucky horse has been in the Senate barn since 1985.

— Maggie Kuchta, via letters@sentinelcolorado.com

2 replies on “LETTERS: The Supreme Court has taken on a game of politics”

  1. Maggie, it was stolen fair and square.
    The SCOTUS sent a message to those opposed that the terrorism used buy the “christian” right over the years worked. We need to take notes.

  2. The Supreme Court has been politically divided for many years now, just like every other governmental agency, body and institution, and that is sad for the people. I get the others, but the SCOTUS was never envisioned or intended to be like this. Alas, that man has cemented its legacy.

Comments are closed.