Colorado lawmakers unveil ‘public option’ health insurance bill

565
In this June 15, 2020, file photo, a handful of lawmakers make their way through the rotunda of the State Capitol in Denver. Setting up one of the most contentious issues of Colorado’s 2021 legislative session, Democratic state lawmakers are introducing a public health care option bill on Thursday, March 18, 2021, that’s intended to drive down insurance costs for individuals. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File)

DENVER  |  Setting up one of the most contentious issues of Colorado’s 2021 legislative session, Democratic state lawmakers announced they are introducing a public health care option bill on Thursday that’s intended to drive down insurance costs for individuals and small businesses hit hard by the coronavirus pandemic.

Long one of Democratic Gov. Jared Polis’ top priorities, and abandoned last year because of the pandemic, the legislation would ask private insurance companies to reduce their premium rates for individual plans by 20% of what they are now by the end of 2024. If they don’t meet that target, a nonprofit state-administered plan that sets price limits would kick in.

The plan is the latest iteration of an ambitious agenda set by Polis since his 2019 inauguration to make health care more affordable and expand its availability.

In his February state of the state address, Polis again challenged lawmakers to create a state-administered health insurance option that could generate more competition in a market where many rural residents have few insurer options, even alongside the state health insurance exchange created under the Affordable Care Act.

In a gesture to the health care industry, Thursday’s bill, sponsored by Reps. Dylan Roberts and Iman Jodeh and Sen. Kerry Donovan, would give insurers, hospitals and pharmaceutical manufacturers time to deliver the lower costs on their own.

If they don’t, the state would set prices for private insurers selling to individuals, who represent 8% of Colorado’s insurance market, and small groups and businesses, which account for another 15%.

It also would set prices that hospitals and prescription drug makers can charge people who choose to buy plans under the public option.

Last year, the health care industry demanded that it help fashion an option, said Roberts, who with Donovan represents rural mountain and Western Slope districts with some of the nation’s highest premiums and fewest plan choices.

“This year’s proposal will take them at their word,” Roberts said.

“The current system that protects profits and not patients is not working,” Donovan said. “We refuse to accept that there is nothing to be done.”

Companion legislation this session seeks to drive down prescription drug costs by creating a state board to investigate cost increases and set guardrails for the most expensive prescription drugs. Other bills would expand state efforts to import cheaper prescription drugs from abroad; require middlemen in the prescription drug market known as pharmacy benefit managers to competitively bid for state contracts for state employee prescription plans; and create a behavioral health administration to oversee mental health services.

In 2019, Washington became the only U.S. state to adopt a public option. Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee has called the program a step toward universal health care.

As it did last year, a Colorado nonprofit lobbying group called the Partnership for America’s Health Care Future is airing ads assailing the proposal. The group, which opposes government-run health care initiatives, says price-setting could force care health care facilities to increase prices for patients or for insurers not in the individual market, cut services, or both. Its members include insurance companies and hospitals.

“No matter what the time frame, the state government option would put politicians in control of Coloradans’ health care, could increase costs for Coloradans, and hurt patients’ access to quality care, services, and coverage choices,” spokesman Tyler Mounsey said in a recent statement.

Lt. Gov. Dianne Primavera insisted Thursday that the bill is an opportunity for industry partners to innovate. Noting the money being spent against the proposal, she challenged the industry to instead come to the table.

“We can’t just rely on promises,” said Primavera, who also heads the Office of Saving People Money on Health Care.

A state health department report released in 2020 said Colorado hospitals’ per-patient profits reached their highest levels in a decade in 2018. Hospitals earned an average per-patient profit of $1,518 in 2018, compared with $538 in 2009, according to the report. The department insisted that inflation and expenses alone didn’t explain the increase.

Hospital associations insist profits are used to replace aging equipment, reduce debt and sustain services at a time when the pandemic has imposed severe budgetary pressures on health care facilities. They warn that state intervention could put undue financial pressure on hospital facilities, especially in rural areas where health care facilities have slim operating margins.

Under Polis’ administration, Colorado’s Democratic-controlled Legislature has created a reinsurance market to compensate private insurers for their highest-cost cases; mandated hospital price transparency; and adopted consumer protections against surprise out-of-network medical bills.

 

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Its5oclocksomewhere
Its5oclocksomewhere
23 days ago

What’s the downside? I didn’t see any information about that in your article. Thanks

Joe Felice
Joe Felice
23 days ago

Why haven’t the naysayers come up with their own plan, instead of just faulting those of others. Something needs to be accomplished here.

Victor Honore
Victor Honore
20 days ago

61% of the 13.1 million legal permanent residents do not purchase private health insurance, If we required all incoming Green Card recipients to first ACTIVATE their Health Insurance BEFORE they can ACTIVATE their Green Cards in 4 years time you would a 100% compliance involving 4 million legal permanent residents that will arrive during those 4 years (1 million GCs are granted every year). All are financially solvent. We are the only country in the world that permits permanent residency WITHOUT health insurance. The estimated 4 million new Green Card Holders, at 8000 a yr would generate 8B + 16B + 24B + 32B = $80 Billion in that 4-year span, which should be enough justification for health insurers to lower their prices 20%.