Colorado lawmakers give 1st OK to ban on Native American mascots

DENVER  |  Colorado lawmakers are considering a proposal that would ban Native American mascots in public schools and colleges amid a nationwide push for racial justice that gained new momentum last year following George Floyd’s death in Minneapolis and the NFL team in Washington changing its name.

The measure, which cleared the state Senate Education Committee on Thursday, would include a $25,000 monthly fine on public schools, colleges and universities that use American Indian-themed mascots after June 1, 2022.

The committee passed amendments exempting schools that have or will seek agreements with local tribes to use such mascots. The changes also would exempt schools on tribal lands.

Colorado is one of seven states considering legislation that would prohibit the use of Native American mascots, according the National Conference of State Legislatures. In 2019, Maine became the first state to ban them.

Nearly two dozen schools in Colorado still use Native American mascots such as the “Warriors,” “Reds” and “Savages,” according to Democratic state Sen. Jessie Danielson, one of the bill’s sponsors. Two prominent high schools dropped their “Indians” mascot in the last year: Cheyenne Mountain in Colorado Springs and Loveland High School in a city in northern Colorado.

A commission of tribal members and state agencies in 2015 recommended schools remove Native American mascots, but many still remain.

“They’ve been protested. They’ve been begged. They’ve even been urged by the state of Colorado to do the right thing, and instead of taking it on their own to do the right thing, they’ve decided to continue using derogatory mascots,” Danielson said of the state’s need to intervene.

Before the Senate committee, tribal members testified that the bill was important because of the nation’s history of erasing Native American culture by prohibiting traditional practices and setting up boarding schools to assimilate youth.

“My people have worked hard to overcome these policies aimed to exterminate our existence and any record of our history and culture,” Southern Ute Tribal Chairman Melvin J. Baker said.

Along with those policies, Baker said the “inaccurate and cruel portrayals” of Native Americans as mascots have been used as “strategic tools to marginalize Indigenous communities.”

Sylvester Roubideaux, a member of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe, opposed the bill. He testified that the “Indians” mascot at a high school in Yuma, Colorado, where his family lives, has allowed for celebration of Native American culture in his community.

Roubideaux said taking away the mascots would mean less Native American representation and that they would become a “vanishing people.”

The legislation says the mascots create “an unsafe learning environment” for Indigenous students by “promoting bullying” and teach other students that “it is acceptable to participate in culturally abusive and prejudicial behaviors.”

At the committee hearing, Talon Long, an 18-year-old from a Native American family, recalled his classmates calling him “Chief Talon” and asking if he lived in a cave in the mountains.

“I’m not anyone’s mascot, and I’m not an animal, a savage or anyone’s good luck charm,” Brody SeeWalker, a seventh-grader and Lakota descendant from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, testified. “I am a human and a proud Lakota who comes from a long line of ancestors that fought so very hard so that I could be standing here before you today.”

The push to remove mascots with Native American imagery began during the civil rights movement in the 1960s, according to the National Congress of American Indians, a nonprofit established in 1944 to protect Native American and Alaska Native rights.

The movement gained little attention until 2005, when the National Collegiate Athletic Association directed schools to end the use of “hostile or abusive” mascots and imagery in college-level sports. In later years, the conversation spread to the multibillion-dollar industry of the NFL.

After years of pressure and a federal ruling, the NFL team in Washington decided to drop the Redskins name last July and become the “Washington Football Team.”

More than 1,900 schools across the U.S. had American Indian-themed mascots as of last week, according to a database kept by the National Congress of American Indians.

In 2020, there were 68 schools in Utah, Ohio, Michigan, Idaho, New York, Massachusetts and California that scrapped American Indian-themed mascots, the database shows.

Proposed name changes often draw pushback because getting rid of a mascot means new uniforms, signs on fields and imagery on merchandise.

Measures in Washington state and Illinois would allow their use if a nearby tribe approves a request from the school, something Oregon has already passed. Illinois’ bill also adds exemptions for schools that conduct yearly schoolwide programs on Native American culture and offer courses on “Native American contributions to society.”

California prohibits public schools from using “Redskins” as a nickname or mascot.


Nieberg is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

Let’s take more money from our students for their education to pay to replace uniforms, signs, gym floors, hallway logos, walls, etc. Education is so well funded that we won’t even notice the dollars diverted.

Dennis Duffy
Dennis Duffy
1 year ago

OMG, lets just call everyone and everything by a numerical moniker. It would involve your birthdate, xxxxxx plus the longitude and latitude of the place you were born xxxxxxxx plus the weather temperature on that day…
so i could be [email protected] that way no ones feelings will get hurt.

Joe Felice
Joe Felice
1 year ago

Isn’t it sad that, in this country, we have to have a law to get people to do the right thing? We are a racist nation, now more than ever. Just ask people in other countries.

I actually don’t find mascots that are named after tribes to be offensive. In fact, many consider them to be an honor. I also don’t mind Chiefs and Braves. But there are names that are racist, such as Indians (Indians are people from India.), Warriors, Redskins, Reds and Savages.

Walter Goddard
Walter Goddard
1 year ago

On the surface this appears to be a courteous and humane gesture of equality and respect..

At the same time it also stinks, of hypocrisy and camouflage; in an attempt to escalate use of indigenous and minority groups, race, religion, health, public safety, environment, and religion… control the opposition, cancel, erase: history, knowledge and understanding of science and culture from America and the rest of the world….

Someone please explain to, We The People, what it means to be elected by the people for the people?

Regardless of which party was elected, isn’t an elected official required to represent all the people?

Is it still the USA?
I see so many of you, playing the agenda game and dismissing the will, expressed by the people..
…Especially where it concerns writing.. illegal laws!
..Start with that!

Imagine for a moment… a lawyer, a judge, an elite intolerant billionaire, with an agenda..

..Breaking laws, and writing legislation, as law, that’s contrary to the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights..

Write legal laws and enforce them…
Stop punishing people you disagree with and using criminals as an excuse to do it!

1 year ago

Sure first we kept pushing them from the best lands and now we feel they are disrespected in history by “kids proud of their team” Yes Lets just re write their history more and make them disappear. Then we can move to the next group. Eventually we can just have the beige of america against the black minority to include in our pitiful history books- but who cares it won’t be taught in our schools anyway.