FILE - Brian Hackel, right, an overdose prevention specialist, helps Steven Baez, a client suffering addiction, find a vein to inject intravenous drugs at an overdose prevention center, OnPoint NYC, in New York, Feb. 18, 2022. Across the U.S., drug overdoses killed an estimated 100,000 people in 2021, according to federal health officials. That has pushed lawmakers in Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada to consider joining New York in allowing what are often called “overdose prevention centers" — spaces where people can use illicit drugs under the supervision of trained staff who could reverse an overdose if necessary. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File)

DENVER | A Colorado bill to allow “safe injection sites” — where people can use illicit drugs under the supervision of trained staff who can reverse an overdose — was killed in committee Wednesday evening by Democrats concerned with enabling addiction and a lack of proper guardrails.

The controversial idea of such sites — which New York and Rhode Island, along with Canada and Australia already host — incited emotional debate as it moved through the Colorado’s Democratic-controlled legislature after the state’s record-high of over 1,600 overdose deaths in 2021.

Proponents argued that it’s an imperative first step to prevent drug overdoses that killed an estimated 100,000 people nationwide in 2021, federal data show. The safe injection sites, also called “overdose prevention centers,” offer a place where trained staff monitor people who bring and use their own drugs — such as methamphetamine and heroin — and who could reverse an overdose if necessary.

The policy is an about-face from federal government’s long-waged war on drugs, and detractors said the centers would merely endorse and promote the use of illegal drugs and would be a magnet for ancillary crimes.

After last ditch efforts by the bill’s sponsors to appease one of their Democratic colleagues on the Senate Health and Human Services Committee, the bill was voted down in an unceremonious and brusque vote Wednesday.

Democratic Sen. Kyle Mullica, who voted against the bill, had previously said he was torn by the issue, worried about regulating the sites — which would be left up to local municipalities — and whether it was the most effective solution.

Similarly, Democratic Sen. Joann Ginal said she wasn’t convinced by the available evidence, before reading testimony from one of her constituents — a former drug user — who compared the bill to giving a kid who was overweight a jar of cookies.

The bill’s failure reveals the wariness of Colorado’s moderate Democrats over some progressive measures in the once-purple state, even after the party’s sweeping success in the midterm elections and control of the House, Senate and governor’s office.

One of the bill’s sponsors, Democratic Sen. Julie Gonzales, pushed back against concerns, saying that “If we do not take action, one person who dies is too many.”

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis had voiced skepticism over the proposal, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a similar bill last year.

Questions also remain over whether the Department of Justice will permit such programs based on a 1980s-era law that bans operating a place for taking illegal drugs.

Last year, the Justice Department told The Associated Press it was “evaluating” safe injection sites and talking to regulators about “appropriate guardrails.”

Still, being open to evaluating the sites marks a shift from the Justice Department’s posture under former President Donald Trump, when the department fought against such a proposal in Pennsylvania.

____

Bedayn is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

____

Editor’s note: A previous version of this story included a photograph of an opioid treatment facility run by Community Medical Services that is not a safe injection site.

The Associated Press is an independent, not-for-profit news cooperative of 1,300 newspapers, including The Sentinel, headquartered in New York City. News teams in over 100 countries tell the world’s...

5 replies on “Colorado Dems kill ‘safe injection site’ bill for drug users”

  1. Honestly, I’m tired of being told that someone’s “bright, wonderful, smart, etc.,” son, sister, whoever died from an overdose. Taking or using anything off the streets is playing Russian Roulette with five bullets instead of one, which in no way denotes “smart.” It makes me wonder why I should care about their lives, when clearly THEY DO NOT. If an addict truly wants help, there should be a path for them. Enabling the continuation of addiction is a waste of money that could be used to save those who WANT to be saved.
    I’m not an uncaring person-just one who thinks throwing good money after bad is ridiculous.

    1. And would the “safe” injection site make the addict a more attentive parent? A more dependable employee? A safer driver? No, not at all.

  2. Hallelujah! Now, let’s focus all our collective energy on promoting healthy children and strong families.

  3. One of the bill’s sponsors, Democratic Sen. Julie Gonzales, pushed back against concerns, saying that “If we do not take action, one person who dies is too many.”

    The mantra of the emotionally manipulative, along with “If you don’t give me what I want I’ll kill myself.”

Comments are closed.