Colorado House panel approves bill to limit gun magazine capacity

839

DENVER |  A bill that would ban high-capacity magazines, crafted by an Aurora lawmaker in response to the July 20 theater massacre, passed out of a Colorado House Committee on Feb. 12.

The bill was approved by the House Judiciary Committee on a vote of 7 to 4, hours after Democratic committee members passed another bill that would require universal background checks for gun buyers.

House Bill 1224, sponsored by state Rep. Rhonda Fields, D-Aurora, would ban the sale, transfer or possession of high-capacity magazines that accept more than 15 rounds of ammunition or eight shotgun shells. The bill would not be retroactive, meaning current owners of high-capacity magazines would be able to keep their magazines. The bill was amended from its earlier version, which banned magazines that carried more than 10 rounds.

James Holmes, the alleged shooter in the Aurora theater massacre, was armed with a 100-round high-capacity magazine that contributed to the deaths of 12 people in the July 20 theater shootings.

Fields said her proposal would decrease fatalities associated with high-capacity magazines. “(Shooters) use these large magazines to be able to kill as many people as they possibly can,” she said. “These type of high-capacity clips have no place in our community, in our streets, in movie theaters, or in our schools.”

Supporters of the bill included some Colorado residents connected with the July 20 theater massacre.

Arapahoe County Coroner Michael Doberson said he supports Fields’ proposal because high-capacity magazines cause devastating wounds. He said they are military weapons that shouldn’t be in the hands of civilians.

Aurora resident Jessica Watts, cousin of Jonathan Blunk, who was killed in the Aurora theater shootings, also testified in support of Fields’ bill. She said the Aurora massacre lasted less than two minutes, yet dozens of people were either killed or wounded because of the alleged shooter’s weapons.

“In 90 seconds, that massacre occurred in less time than I will be up here testifying today,” she said.

Arapahoe County resident John Buckley, who was a paramedic for over 20 years, said he supports Fields’ bill because he’s seen the lethal effects of high-capacity magazines firsthand.

“I’ve seen this up close and I wish I didn’t have to,” said Buckley, who is also the chairman of the Arapahoe County Democratic Party.

Another supporter was Littleton resident Jane Dougherty, whose sister was a psychologist killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Connecticut last December. She said her sister’s body was wounded so badly in the attack that her sister’s husband was not allowed to “say goodbye.”

“We cannot wait for another massacre to transpire before we take real action,” she said.

Opponents of the proposal said it would hurt Colorado businesses, infringe on the rights of private residents to protect themselves, and not contribute to a decrease crime.

“I can’t in good conscience strip my citizens of the ability to protect themselves,” said Justin Smith, sheriff of Larimer County.

He said reducing the amount of ammunition in a magazine to a maximum of 10 rounds doesn’t make sense because it’s easy to drop and reload a 10-round magazine clip. He said if the bill passed, law-abiding Colorado residents who want to protect themselves by purchasing high-capacity magazines would drive to Wyoming or other states to purchase them.

Doug Smith, chief operating officer for Erie-based Magpul Industries, which manufactures high-capacity magazines, said the company would be forced to move out of Colorado if the bill passed. The bill would prohibit many of the company’s existing customers from purchasing high-capacity magazines, he said.

“Citizens of Colorado should have access to standard-capacity magazines,” said Smith, defining “standard-capacity magazines” as having 30 rounds of ammunition.

Robert Parker, owner of Wheat Ridge-based Parker Arms & Gunsmithing, which sells new and used guns, said the bill would negatively impact his business.

“I’m concerned this bill is going to make potential criminals out of my lawful customers,” he said.

State Reps. Bob Gardner, R-Colorado Springs, Polly Lawrence, R-Littleton, Carole Murray, R-Castle Rock and Jared Wright, R-Fruita, voted against the bill.

About 30 people testified on Fields’ high-capacity magazine ban bill in total, with twice as many people testifying in opposition of the bill.

Before amendments, Fields’ original bill banned high-capacity magazines that accept more than 10 rounds of ammunition or five shotgun shells.

More than 100 people signed up to testify on Fields’ two gun-control bills during the 8-hour hearings on Feb. 12, the majority of them gun-rights advocates.

Reach reporter Sara Castellanos at 720-449-9036 or [email protected].

 

To read about the other bill, click here.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
fishunter
fishunter
9 years ago

The comment that high capacity magazines “cause devastating wounds” is only true if one hits another with a magazine. I believe a magazine only holds rounds of ammunition. A question I have is, does the limitation include .22 rifles and handguns? I’ve not known of many .22,s used in the military, other than for training or perhaps as covert weapons.

Dingo
Dingo
9 years ago

I’m quite certain that all of the wonderfully law-abiding criminals out there will immediately rush to comply with this delightfully common-sense bill.

idnotego
idnotego
9 years ago

How can people in good conscience continue to ignore the obvious … it is time for limited gun control! Thank you Rep. Rhonda Fields for having the courage to raise the issue and begin the debate.

Curtis AndLaura Rethwisch

How simple minded does one have to believe that restricting the rights of law abiding citizens will stop criminals? Do you have to utterly lack common sense to be a politician?

jpooch00
jpooch00
8 years ago

They don’t do it to stop criminals, they do it to slowly get everybody used to living in a police state where the government dictates every aspect of daily life.

Scruffy
Scruffy
9 years ago

I guess assaults on our other rights are coming too. If the fearful want to freely give up rights that their predecessors and many of us fought to defend, they will be going after any other rights to try to buy safety also.

Pissed
Pissed
9 years ago

If our State representatives passed mandatory sentencing for people who commit crimes with guns we would have less violent crimes in the state, as it is how many times do we read about a criminal who has committed murder or other violent crimes against society having “multiple prior arrests” or convictions and they’re out of prison committing more crimes. Penalize the criminals, not citizens who go out and buy a semi-auto handgun to protect themselves.