Aurora-Denver pact boosts investigations of officer-involved shootings


AURORA | When Aurora police shot and killed a man who attacked an officer with a meat cleaver and stole a police cruiser last month, one of the first phone calls they made was to their counterparts in Denver.

Under a state law passed last year, police departments must bring in investigators from an outside agency when one of their officers is involved in a shooting.

Aurora Police Deputy Chief Paul O’Keefe said having a few extra sets of eyes look over an investigation has been helpful so far.

Aurora Police Chief, Nick Metz, addresses the media after police shot and killed a suspect who attacked an officer and stole the cruiser during a press conference on Monday Nov. 30, 2015 at Aurora Police Department Headquarters. Photo by Gabriel Christus/Aurora Sentinel“We can make sure that nothing gets overlooked,” he said.

The departments already have worked together on a variety of regional efforts, including to combat gangs, and O’Keefe said that lengthy working history makes the transition easier.

The investigators from the two agencies work side-by-side on each case, O’Keefe said.

But, O’Keefe said, while the investigators from Aurora and Denver all bring a lot of experience, the fact that they come from different departments adds a helpful wrinkle to investigations.

“Those experiences are different,” he said. “And it’s an opportunity to have somebody from outside the agency actually take a look at the case.”

Under their current agreement, Aurora police send one command-level officer, one sergeant and two detectives to each officer-involved shooting, and DPD sends the same mix of investigators to Aurora.

The law’s requirement doesn’t actually take effect until after the first of the year, but O’Keefe said the departments opted to start the joint investigations early.

Through mid-December, the departments have investigated several shootings, including four in less than three weeks between the end of November and the middle of December.

At a press conference to discuss details of a Dec. 11 incident during which officers shot and killed a man who killed his girlfriend and stabbed her mother, Aurora police Commander Rob McGregor acknowledged there had been an uptick in officer-involved shootings in Aurora and Denver.

“It’s been a busy couple of weeks for both agencies,” he said.

State Sen. John Cooke, who sponsored the legislation last year, said that while most communities have ample faith in their local police, adding an extra layer to the investigation — and especially an outside agency — can add to that confidence.

“Especially a lot of the communities of color will say, ‘Alright, this isn’t one agency doing their own investigation, there is gonna be somebody from the outside who is going to be a part of this,’” he said.

The legislation didn’t mandate how many outside investigators need to work on a officer-involved shooting, and Cooke, the former Weld County sheriff, said that was by design.

While Aurora and Denver have massive police forces, small, rural jurisdictions may only have a few officers total, so they might only be able to assign a single investigator to assist an outside agency, he said.

“It’s not one size fits all,” he said.

Still, Cooke said, those rural communities are typically accustomed to working with outside investigators on homicide and officer-involved shooting cases, so they, too, should have an easy transition to bringing on someone from an outside agency.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ashley In Aurora
Ashley In Aurora
5 years ago

Unfortunately, this won’t do anything to quell the outrage of the current movement and hostility being directed at law enforcement today. The facts of a case, no longer seem to matter.
Most often, I place the blame squarely on the shoulders of the city attorneys, city manager, local politicians and media. Early on in these investigations, well before an officer has gotten his/her due process and has been proven to be guilty of a crime, the aforementioned rush to quiet and settle a case by compensating “victims” or their families. All on the basis that it saves the city from having to pay more by avoiding a long legal battle. Thus, they’ve created the delusion of guilt and the media stirs the pot in order to obtain more viewership.
It’s all such a game and LEO’s everywhere are paying for a front row ticket to a circus they never expected to attend. Even so, it’s incumbent upon those with whom so much is entrusted, to take the initiative and do what is right, long before it becomes required.
I’ll end with this sage advice although none was requested. From the moment law enforcement makes contact, your outcome is based almost solely on your own actions or inaction. Decide for yourself in that moment, does my life matter to me today? Then conduct yourself accordingly should you conclude the answer to be a firm, yes.
If given the choice, the vast majority of officer’s want to conclude their interaction with you, and move on to the next call. Let them get on with their day, and you’ll quickly move on with yours.
Merry Christmas one and all.

5 years ago

Oh hell yes, more investigations into police actions, but on the other hand, Sally Mounier, Aurora City Council member, requests a $400,000.00 purchase of a corner lot on Colfax to build a ‘comfort station’ for illegals queuing up for daily work, all are paid in cash, no tax, no problem. Yes, our Aurora city council member requested this idiocy, but certainly More police investigations, you betcha’

Ashley In Aurora
Ashley In Aurora
5 years ago
Reply to  gofastgo

No, according to council Aurora is not a sanctuary city. Right…..Have you ever noticed how they cry poor mouth until they find the next big thing to tag their name to gofastgo?

5 years ago

The entire liberal narrative, is just sad for America Ashley.